- From: Sam Tregar <sam@tregar.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:12:34 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Dare Obasanjo wrote: > I doubt that any implementation uses the sForS given that it is an > invalid schema and even if it wasn't does not fully describe all the > constraints in the W3C XML Schema recommendation. Thanks, that's good to know. I won't bother with it then. -sam
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:15:20 UTC