Monday, 28 February 2005
Tuesday, 22 February 2005
Friday, 25 February 2005
Thursday, 24 February 2005
- RE: Minutes, 24 February 2005 WS Description telcon
- Minutes, 24 February 2005 WS Description telcon
- Proposed Change for Interface Component {features} and {properties}
- Re: Action 2005-01-13 Resolution of Issue 271
- RE: Action 2005-01-13 Resolution of Issue 270
- Action 2005-01-13 Resolution of Issue 271
- Action 2005-01-13 Resolution of Issue 270
Wednesday, 23 February 2005
Friday, 18 February 2005
Thursday, 17 February 2005
- WBS straw poll on Appendix E disposition (closes Wed midnight)
- RE: Minutes, 17 February 2005 WS Description WG telcon
- Minutes, 17 February 2005 WS Description WG telcon
- RE: First Class Header Proposals
- RE: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d
- Re: First Class Header Proposals
- Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d
- Regrets for Telecon 2005-02-15
- Re: LC84b: Proposal for generic action property
- schemaLocation background
Wednesday, 16 February 2005
Tuesday, 15 February 2005
- Agenda, 17 February 2004 WS Desc telcon
- [OT] Call for participation in an experiment
- SSDL: SOAP Service Description Language
Monday, 14 February 2005
Friday, 11 February 2005
- RE: Consistency of WSDL Component property names
- RE: LC84b: Proposal for generic action property
- RE: i017b: Action and ONM
- RE: LC84b: Proposal for generic action property
Thursday, 10 February 2005
Tuesday, 8 February 2005
Thursday, 10 February 2005
Wednesday, 9 February 2005
- Agenda, 10 February 2004 WS Desc telcon
- RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties?
- RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties?
- RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties?
- RE: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model
- Consistency of WSDL Component property names
Tuesday, 8 February 2005
Monday, 7 February 2005
- RE: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model
- FW: i017b: Action and ONM
- RE: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model
- RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties?
- Re: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties?
- RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties?
- Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties?
- Re: Test Suite Update
- First Class Header Proposals
- RE: Summary: AD Feature Related Issues
Saturday, 5 February 2005
Friday, 4 February 2005
Thursday, 3 February 2005
Monday, 31 January 2005
Thursday, 3 February 2005
- RE: SOAP Header Blocks in WSDL (was RE: First Class Headers - Pr oposed Resolution for LC76d
- RE: Summary: AD Feature Related Issues
- Summary: AD Feature Related Issues
- RE: SOAP Header Blocks in WSDL (was RE: First Class Headers - Pr oposed Resolution for LC76d
Wednesday, 2 February 2005
- Agenda, 3 February 2004 WS Desc telcon
- Action item on optional extensions
- RE: apparent bug on the operation name mapping requirement text
- WSDL 2.0 Primer - remaining work
- Re: SOAP Header Blocks in WSDL (was RE: First Class Headers - Pr oposed Resolution for LC76d
- Re: SOAP Header Blocks in WSDL (was RE: First Class Headers - Pr oposed Resolution for LC76d