Re: LC84b: Proposal for generic action property

* Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com> [2005-02-11 01:00-0500]
[..]
> Hugo, do we need to update the SOAP over HTTP binding to specify that the
> SOAPAction header gets set to the {action} property of the input message?

Yes, we would.

> Do we need to specify where the {action} property of an output message goes
> in the response?  Does it go nowhere?

For SOAP 1.2, I think that it can be expressed on the output message
too.

SOAP 1.1 defines SOAPAction only for the request AFAICT[1], so it
wouldn't be expressed in this case.

Cheers,

Hugo

  1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383528
-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/