W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2005

RE: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:06:25 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709E023@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <hugo@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

i'd prefer a generic mechanism too. 

i wondered if the informal dislike of headers i've witnessed in this 
WG over the past year or so was authoritatively explained somewhere 
i can reference. 

That would help the likes of me explain why application level headers
are to be avoided when publishing Web services.


-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Hugo Haas
Sent: 17 February 2005 14:56
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d

* Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> [2005-01-30 23:55+0600]
> If someone wants to put back wsoap:header then I will not have a heart
> attack and die over that one. 

I for one don't like a SOAP binding-specific facility for this. I much
prefer a generic mechanism bound to SOAP.



Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 15:05:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:47 UTC