- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:08:48 -0800
- To: "Francisco Curbera" <curbera@us.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I believe with the recent decision to rewrite the ONMR as a Best Practice that this is no longer an issue. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Francisco Curbera > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:50 PM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > Subject: apparent bug on the operation name mapping requirement text > > > The core spec currently says that an extension element can be included > in > the interface component for indicating how the operation name mapping > requirement is satisfied. This would not appropriately support the > case in > which a transport level artifact is in fact used to satisfy the > requirement > since it would mix binding details at the abstract level. People seem > to > agree this is a bug which I am now dutifully reporting. > > Paco > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:09:27 UTC