- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:07:03 -0500
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF42427A88.60664557-ON85256FAC.000A825B-85256FAC.000B9F6D@ca.ibm.com>
Jonathan, Thx. I'll write up the Primer section and add some test cases to the Test Suite. Arthur Ryman, Rational Desktop Tools Development phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/ "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 02/16/2005 07:46 PM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Subject schemaLocation background As I recall it, there have been several items relating to embedded and imported schemas and the use of schemaLocation. I have an action to help dig up the schemaLocation scenarios. 1) Can you inline two schemas instead of one. Answer: yes, even if they have the same targetNamespace (but no duplicate definitions.) [1, 2] 2) Can you import one embedded schema into the other. Answer: yes, this should be expected to work. A schemaLocation attribute with a fragment ID can be added to make this explicit. [3, 4] 3) Can you see schema components in an imported WSDL. Answer: no, this is by design. [5] 4) I thought we also agreed that you can import a schema embedded in another WSDL, and a schemaLocation attribute with a fragment ID would likely be required by most processors in this case. (A schemaLocation pointing to the WSDL file would not conform to the defn of schemaLocation.) I can't find documentation on this point though. Hope this is what you were looking for... [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#lc60 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jan/att-0092/2005012 7-ws-desc-minutes.html#item07 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Sep/0022.html [4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html?view=wg#LC65 [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Nov/0130.html
Received on Friday, 18 February 2005 02:07:39 UTC