Sunday, 31 August 2003
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -
 - Re: [VE][247] New Error Message Suggestion
 - Re: [VE][247] New Error Message Suggestion
 - Re: [VE][247] New Error Message Suggestion
 - [VE][247] New Error Message Suggestion
 - Re: Validation result uri link encoding
 - Re: Validation result uri link encoding
 - Re: Validation result uri link encoding
 - Validation result uri link encoding
 - Suggested help for message #338
 - Error Message #247
 - RE: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
 - Re: Missing DTD's
 - Re: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
 - Re: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
 - Re: Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
 - Re: Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
 - Re: New Validator Error Suggestions
 - RE: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
 
Saturday, 30 August 2003
- [beta] The miracles of file uploads...
 - Re: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
 - Missing DTD's
 - Re: shift_jis,iso-8859-1
 - Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
 - Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
 - Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
 - Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
 - Re: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
 - Re: New Validator Error Suggestions
 - Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
 - Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
 - Re: New Validator Error Suggestions
 - Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
 - Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
 - [VE][338] New Error Message Suggestion
 - Re: CSS Validator bug.
 - Re: CSS Validator bug.
 - CSS Validator bug.
 - [VE][108] New Error Message Suggestion
 - validator not returning any results and some other small issues.
 - Re: [VE][127] New Error Message Suggestion
 - New Validator Error Suggestions (was: [VE][70] New Error Message Suggestion)
 - CatalogueManager: Automatic maintenance of SGML and XML Libraries
 
Friday, 29 August 2003
- [VE][404] New Error Message Suggestion
 - [VE][404] New Error Message Suggestion
 - [VE][127] New Error Message Suggestion
 - [VE][394] New Error Message Suggestion
 - [VE][338] New Error Message Suggestion
 - [VE][70] New Error Message Suggestion
 - Re: HTML Validator always fails (check script problem)
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
 - HTML Validator always fails (check script problem)
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
 - Re: Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
 - Red Hat (9/Severn beta) RPMs of the validator
 - Re: Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
 
Thursday, 28 August 2003
- Validator suggestion: show less errors!
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - RE: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - [VE][64] New Error Message Suggestion
 - [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
 - Re: HTML code for correct HTML pages is incorrect
 - Re: [www-validator] <none>
 
Monday, 25 August 2003
Thursday, 28 August 2003
Wednesday, 27 August 2003
- Re: XML doesn't validate but won't say why...
 - Re: [Enh] Help correcting lack of charset info?
 - Re: Recognition of WML DTDs
 - Re: shift_jis,iso-8859-1
 - Re: Misleading (or wrong) messages
 - Re: a validator bug?
 - Re: [bug] apos delimited fpi
 - Re: Suggestion: encoding and doctype tips to the users of validator
 
Tuesday, 26 August 2003
Saturday, 23 August 2003
Friday, 22 August 2003
Thursday, 21 August 2003
Monday, 18 August 2003
- Re: checklink: http://www.gdgreiss.de/links/links.html
 - checklink: http://www.gdgreiss.de/links/links.html
 
Sunday, 17 August 2003
Saturday, 16 August 2003
Friday, 15 August 2003
Thursday, 14 August 2003
Wednesday, 13 August 2003
Thursday, 14 August 2003
Tuesday, 12 August 2003
- Re: Support for ISO/IEC 15445:2000
 - Re: DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
 - Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
 - Re: Translation of the validator's documentation
 - Re: DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
 - Re: DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
 - Re: Translation of the validator's documentation
 - Re: DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
 - DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
 - Re: Translation of the validator's documentation
 - Translation of the validator's documentation
 
Monday, 11 August 2003
Sunday, 10 August 2003
Monday, 11 August 2003
Sunday, 10 August 2003
Saturday, 9 August 2003
- Re: Suggestion to make life easier for some users
 - Re: Suggestion to make life easier for some users
 - Suggestion to make life easier for some users
 
Friday, 8 August 2003
- Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
 - Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
 - Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
 - Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
 - Re: checklink%3A%20
 - Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
 - checklink%3A%20
 - Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
 - Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
 - Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
 - Re: Links to "Invalid Page"?
 
Thursday, 7 August 2003
- Re: suggested enhancement
 - Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
 - Re: suggested enhancement
 - Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
 - suggested enhancement
 - RE: Error in validator: 1st <table> treated differently in XHTML transitional?
 - Re: Validation failure
 - Error in validator: 1st <table> treated differently in XHTML transitional?
 - Validation failure
 - Re: HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
 - Re: HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
 - Re: Links to "Invalid Page"?
 - Re: HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
 - Re: Small error found
 - Re: Your validator is on crack
 - Re: HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
 - Welcome to the oeea_org group
 
Wednesday, 6 August 2003
- Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
 - help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
 - Newbie problems setting up validator
 - Re: Problems validating website
 
Tuesday, 5 August 2003
- Re: Problems validating website
 - Problems validating website
 - HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
 - [FYI] minor interruption of service, validator.w3.org
 
Monday, 4 August 2003
Sunday, 3 August 2003
Friday, 1 August 2003
Sunday, 3 August 2003
Saturday, 2 August 2003
- Validator bug
 - Links to "Invalid Page"?
 - ,validate (Was : Idea for the validators)
 - Re: Idea for the validators
 
Friday, 1 August 2003
- Re: Busted link on source download
 - Busted link on source download
 - Re: validator.w3.org "is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict"
 - validator.w3.org "is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict"
 - An error with your page.
 - Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
 - RE: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
 - Re: Validator.w3.org dead links
 - Re: Validator.w3.org dead links