Re: New Validator Error Suggestions from Bjoern Hoehrmann on 2003-08-31 (www-validator@w3.org from August 2003)

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 04:21:48 +0200
To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3f7c3d96.44882006@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Terje Bless wrote:
>Hmmm. I hadn't considered that. If the number of suggestions becomes excessive
>— that is, if we actually do get suggestions for every missing explanation or
>improvements to the existing ones — this would quickly turn into a problem.
>
>OTOH, having these suggestions here allows peer review by a wider audience
>(and avoids Yet Another Mailinglist).

Use a <form>. You can't reasonably expect peer review on this list as
reviewers have no idea what error 338 or 70 could be and whether the
suggested text makes sense for that message. If you want peer review on
this list at some stage, post a summary of what has been suggested.

Received on Saturday, 30 August 2003 22:22:51 UTC