Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -

P. Taylor@Rhul.Ac.UK wrote:

<<<<<
JAMESICUS@aol.com wrote:
> 
> Refer to:
> 
> http://www.cs.tcd.ie/15445/15445.html#SYSVALID

Er, pardon ?!

"c.It finds and reports an HTML error if one exits; and "
                          ^^^^^
>>>>>

But ..... "d. it does not report an HTML error where none exists." ..... and 
I am questioning whether that tenet is being compromised when "not valid" is 
being reported for documents via the Validator default "Fussy" mode that are in 
fact valid documents. Doesn't that imply that the Validator is somehow 
reporting errors?

James Pickering
http://www.jp29.org/
Computer programming since 1951 (IBM 407)