- From: <martin@lucas-smith.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 13:06:11 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
[Sorry if this has been asked before, but the list search didn't show up a similar enquiry.] Three points of feedback: 1) I notice that the validator and the beta version v0.6.5 [Beta #1], in the section: "If you would like to create a link to this page (i.e., this validation result)..." an encoded version of the URL is given. e.g. http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foobar.com%2Fpath Is there any need for this? I.e. couldn't http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http://www.foobar.com/path be used instead? This would seem more intelligible and user-friendly. Aren't / and : legal characters in <a href= > links? 2) There appears to be a space between check? and uri in the visible (rather than underlying link) version of this text as it appears. This makes cutting and pasting into HTML source potentially error-creating if people don't realise. I don't see any reason for the existence of this space. 3) The beta is a great improvement. My only comment would be to replace the mailto: links on the right in fussy mode with a link to a feedback form, which automatically carries the error number. Presumably you would also get less spam that way, and not everyone has immediate access to a MUA. In doing this, you could also reduce this very verbose text and arguably intrusive text box with a simple link saying e.g. "[Feedback - help improve this error message]" and thereby remove the gray box by putting this directly after the message itself in square brackets []. Martin Lucas-Smith ** www.lucas-smith.co.uk Cambridge **
Received on Sunday, 31 August 2003 08:10:33 UTC