www-html@w3.org from February 2004 by date

Sunday, 29 February 2004

• Admin is on Vacation Steiph Zargon
• Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! Rick [Kitty5]
• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Image Maps: A Presentational Structure Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Image Maps: A Presentational Structure David Woolley
• Image Maps: A Presentational Structure Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! Tony S.Wu
• Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! zargon
• Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! Martin E
• Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! Kurtis Kroon

Saturday, 28 February 2004

• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) Ernest Cline
• CONGRATULATIONS interlottery@iname.com
• [off topic] Apologies Martin E
• RE: Roadnode Rodeo Orion Adrian
• Roadnode Rodeo Wingnut
• Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! Wingnut
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) Rimantas Liubertas
• Weekly activity report ij@w3.org
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) Jukka K. Korpela
• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! Martin E
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) Rimantas Liubertas

Friday, 27 February 2004

• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) Ernest Cline
• RE: Admin, filter this guy off!!! Niklas Wahlberg
• Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! Martin E
• Admin, filter this guy off!!! Martin E
• Re: Simplicity of Concept Orion Adrian
• congratulation interlottery@iname.com
• Congratulations interlottery@iname.com
• <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) Marcus
• Re: Why is border not an attribute of iframe in HTML 4.0? Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Why is border not an attribute of iframe in HTML 4.0? Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 26 February 2004

• Why is border not an attribute of iframe in HTML 4.0? Prive

Friday, 27 February 2004

• Re: Simplicity of Concept David Woolley
• Simplicity of Concept Orion Adrian

Thursday, 26 February 2004

• Re: XHTML and RDF David Woolley
• Re: XHTML and RDF David Woolley
• Re[2]: XHTML and RDF Rimantas Liubertas
• Re: XHTML and RDF David Woolley
• Please stop sending me emails Julius Plenz
• I hate you dsr@w3.org
• Re: XHTML and RDF Tantek Çelik
• RE: XHTML and RDF Jewett, Jim J
• RE: XHTML and RDF Ian Hickson
• RE: XHTML and RDF Mark Birbeck
• Re: top-down look at son-of-ABBR Jens Meiert
• Re: 'style' attribute Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 25 February 2004

• Re: XHTML and RDF Tantek Çelik
• Re: XHTML and RDF David Woolley
• RE: XHTML and RDF Orion Adrian
• Re[2]: 'style' attribute Rimantas Liubertas
• RE: XHTML and RDF Ian Hickson
• RE: XHTML and RDF Mark Birbeck
• Re: XHTML and RDF Ian Hickson
• Re: 'style' attribute Brian Bober
• XHTML and RDF Steven Pemberton
• Question on <abbr /> element use Jens Meiert
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Jesper Tverskov
• Re: LINK types fantasai

Tuesday, 24 February 2004

• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Jukka K. Korpela
• [META] Being taken off list once a day due to third party spam. David Woolley
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: LINK types Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: LINK types Chris Croome
• LINK types Age Bosma
• stolen ij@w3.org

Monday, 23 February 2004

• green ... dsr ..... green dsr
• Re: 'style' attribute Toby A Inkster
• Re: 'style' attribute Orion Adrian
• Re: 'style' attribute Brian Bober
• Re: 'style' attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: 'style' attribute Orion Adrian
• Include pieces of code in an HTML file ashish anand
• information chris@w3.org
• Re: 'style' attribute Tantek Çelik
• Eliminate the page metaphor. Orion Adrian
• Re: 'style' attribute Orion Adrian

Sunday, 22 February 2004

• Re: 'style' attribute Brian Bober

Saturday, 21 February 2004

• Re: 'style' attribute Orion Adrian
• Please stop sending me emails Julius Plenz

Thursday, 15 January 2004

• SEND-CASH.COM marketing@send-cash.com

Saturday, 21 February 2004

• Re: 'style' attribute Wingnut
• Re: 'style' attribute Wingnut

Friday, 20 February 2004

• XHTML Modularization SE question Andrea Vedaldi
• Re: Request clarification: Does readonly apply to checkboxes and radio buttons? Robin Lionheart
• 'style' attribute (References) Jens Meiert
• 'style' attribute Jens Meiert

Thursday, 19 February 2004

• Re: Request clarification: Does readonly apply to checkboxes and radio buttons? Jukka K. Korpela
• Request clarification: Does readonly apply to checkboxes and radio buttons? Robin Lionheart

Tuesday, 17 February 2004

• Re: style attribute type Toby A Inkster
• style attribute type Greg Baker

Monday, 16 February 2004

• cancelation joan plekkenpol

Sunday, 15 February 2004

• Re: Correct usage of the q element Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Karl Dubost
• Re: Soap re: Possible Tidy improvements David Woolley
• Re: Correct usage of the q element L. David Baron
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Karl Dubost
• Re: Soap re: Possible Tidy improvements J. King

Saturday, 14 February 2004

• Re: Correct usage of the q element L. David Baron
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Karl Dubost
• Re: Character set and character encoding. Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Soap re: Possible Tidy improvements Cyril
• Re: Correct usage of the q element David Woolley

Friday, 13 February 2004

• Re: Correct usage of the q element Ian Hickson
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Christoph Päper
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Christoph Päper
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Ian Hickson
• Re: Soap re: Possible Tidy improvements; off topic; errata corrections. Cyril
• Re: Soap re: Possible Tidy improvements Johannes Koch
• Soap re: Possible Tidy improvements Cyril
• Character set and character encoding. Paolo Candelari
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Jens Meiert
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Ernest Cline

Thursday, 12 February 2004

• Re: need an answer Karl Dubost
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Karl Dubost
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Jukka K. Korpela
• RE: Abuse - corcorsm - Obscenity (KMM69255848V15162L0KM) dawn hames
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Ian Hickson
• Re: Mime Type as metadata and why it's in my HTML document in the first place. David Woolley
• Mime Type as metadata and why it's in my HTML document in the first place. Orion Adrian
• Re: no-www? Orion Adrian

Wednesday, 11 February 2004

• Re: Equivalency of caption, h, and title. Orion Adrian
• no-www? Jeroen Budts
• Re: Equivalency of caption, h, and title. Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Target attrib in HTML 4.01 Strict David Woolley
• re: old html tags - are the really useless? wer yuo
• re: old html tags - are the really useless? wer yuo
• Re: Expansion of the summary tag David Woolley

Tuesday, 10 February 2004

• Re: Target attrib in HTML 4.01 Strict Christoph Päper
• Re: Please remove the src and type attributes. J. King
• Re: Please remove the src and type attributes. Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Please remove the src and type attributes. Orion Adrian
• Re: Please remove the src and type attributes. Toby A Inkster
• Please remove the src and type attributes. Orion Adrian
• Equivalency of caption, h, and title. Orion Adrian
• Re: Expansion of the summary tag Orion Adrian
• Re: Expansion of the summary tag Jens Meiert
• Expansion of the summary tag Orion Adrian
• Re: Target attrib in HTML 4.01 Strict Justin Wood

Monday, 9 February 2004

• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela
• <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Marcus
• Thank You very very much ij@w3.org

Sunday, 8 February 2004

• RE: Abuse - corcorsm - Obscenity (KMM69255848V15162L0KM) g.a. beck
• Re: Target attrib in HTML 4.01 Strict Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Andrew Stevens
• Re: Target attrib in HTML 4.01 Strict Tantek Çelik
• Re: Target attrib in HTML 4.01 Strict Justin Wood
• Style Attribute Included Twice Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Correct usage of the q element Jukka K. Korpela

Saturday, 7 February 2004

• Re: Correct usage of the q element Toby A Inkster
• Re: Target attrib in HTML 4.01 Strict Toby A Inkster
• Correct usage of the q element Nicolas Roeser
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Donna
• Target attrib in HTML 4.01 Strict Justin Wood
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Wingnut
• Re: HTML or XHTML Database Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 6 February 2004

• Re: HTML or XHTML Database Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Donna
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Wingnut
• HTML or XHTML Database Bryan Little
• RE: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Jewett, Jim J
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Wingnut
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Wingnut
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 5 February 2004

• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! David Woolley
• Re: Multiple actions for forms David Woolley
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Wingnut
• RE: Multiple actions for forms Mark Birbeck
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 4 February 2004

• Re: Multiple actions for forms Christoph Päper
• RE: Multiple actions for forms Adam Bregenzer
• RE: Multiple actions for forms Mark Birbeck
• Re: Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Wingnut
• RE: Multiple actions for forms Ian Hickson
• FW_Employees Revenge bumblebee@myrealbox.com
• An updated resume for computer support specialist Colorado Springs Gregory J Masley CNE,CNA,MCSE
• RE: Multiple actions for forms Mark Birbeck
• RE: Multiple actions for forms Ian Hickson
• Re: Multiple actions for forms Lachlan Hunt
• RE: Multiple actions for forms Mark Birbeck
• Multiple actions for forms Jason Henning
• Your legal assistance is very urgently needed! This is not spam! Eric Smith

Tuesday, 3 February 2004

• RE: QandA : A proposed enhancement to HTML Ernest Cline
• Headline: Styles pondering desertion to Content! Wingnut
• RE: QandA : A proposed enhancement to HTML rogergarrett@thunderbirdtechnology.com

Last message date: Sunday, 29 February 2004 16:23:54 UTC