- From: Jeroen Budts <jeroen@lightyear.be>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:25:08 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Maybe this is not the right list for this mail, but i couldn't find the right/better list... A few days ago I found the no-www website [1]. They say that the www subdomain is deprecated. Their argument is that you also don't send e-mails to name@mail.example.com, but just to name@example.com. I feel like they have a point in this. They also classify websites in 3 classes: ~ * Class A is a domainname where www.example.com and example.com ~ refer to the same documents. ~ * Class B is a domain where all the requests to www.example.com ~ are redirected to example.com (using the .htaccess file) ~ * In a Class C domainname www.example.com and example.com refer to ~ two different sites. Does the W3C have any recommandations about this? A time ago I was thinking about the fact that I now sometimes use www.budts.be and sometimes just budts.be, which isnt very efficient. Since i found the no-www website I am considering of making my domainname a class B domain... Kind regards, Thanks in advance, Jeroen Budts _____ [1] no-www.org - -- - ------- <Person xmlns="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" ~ name="Jeroen Budts" ~ mbox="jeroen@lightyear.be" ~ homepage="http://www.lightyear.be" ~ weblog="http://www.budts.be" ~ icqChatID="103911636" /> _____________________________________ NO SoftwarePatents in Europe! Sign the petition: http://petition.eurolinux.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAKp2zH04wF4t7d0oRAoIRAJ9cqiuxFXmaEd2x5c/vNUuYLCbJJQCbBY19 xZUecH/DYcoxB9Snh/y68Y0= =MnOF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2004 16:25:50 UTC