- From: Wingnut <wingnut@winternet.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 05:11:30 -0600
- To: www-html@w3.org
Niklas Wahlberg wrote: > I totally agree, thank you! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin E [mailto:espmartin@hotmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:15 PM > To: www-html@w3.org > Subject: Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!! > > > > Sorry, the dsr@w3.org sender - that dork!!!! > > Spammer - _and_please_do_not_open_his/her_attachments!!!! > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Martin E > To: www-html@w3.org > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:13 PM > Subject: Admin, filter this guy off!!! > > > Someone (List Admin?) get this dork black listed (off this list!!!!!!!!) > ij@w3.org is weird too. And I saw a bbos@w3.org come a spammin' thru recently, too. This is not good cuz Bert is a hero of mine, so anyone who corrupts Bert's name... is on my hit list. :) I'm at or over 50% spam from w3.org. This, and the complaints of lost posts (I lost 2 from the style maillist last month)... could be looked into. While we're at it, lets look into ALL aspects of the w3c to see what unwanted influences are affecting it and its reputation. And let's keep in mind the difference between trolling and healthy scrutiny. Wing
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2004 06:15:06 UTC