www-html@w3.org from April 2004 by date

Wednesday, 28 April 2004

• REMINDER: W3C Workshop on Web Applications and Compound Documents Dean Jackson

Tuesday, 27 April 2004

• Re: object elements with inline data? Ernest Cline
• Re: object elements with inline data? Toby A Inkster
• object elements with inline data? Robert Sayre
• Re: Thank you! mimasa@w3.org

Monday, 26 April 2004

• www-html list configuration changed Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Hi dsr@w3.org
• Protected message dsr@w3.org
• Close to Home comic Kirk Petersen

Saturday, 24 April 2004

• damn! dsr@w3.org

Wednesday, 21 April 2004

• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE

Thursday, 22 April 2004

• Hey dsr@w3.org
• RE: TEXTAREA and white space, CR guenther.grau@ubs.com
• Re: TEXTAREA and white space, CR Jukka K. Korpela
• TEXTAREA and white space, CR guenther.grau@ubs.com
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity David Woolley
• Re: complexity David Woolley

Wednesday, 21 April 2004

• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity David Woolley
• hey you dsr@w3.org
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: <button> element Christian Ottosson
• <button> element Richard Lewis
• stolen dsr@w3.org
• Re: complexity David Woolley

Tuesday, 20 April 2004

• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE
• RE: complexity Jewett, Jim J
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity Christoph Päper
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity David Woolley
• Re: Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation David Woolley
• Re: complexity Tantek Çelik
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity Tantek Çelik
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... fantasai
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson

Monday, 19 April 2004

• Re: complexity olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: complexity olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: complexity olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation Ian Hickson
• Re: Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation Tantek Çelik
• hi chris@w3.org
• Re: Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation Ian Hickson
• Re: Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation Orion Adrian
• Re: Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation David Woolley

Sunday, 18 April 2004

• Re: Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation Ian Hickson
• Re: Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation David Woolley
• Breaking out Headers, Footers and Navigation Orion Adrian
• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE

Saturday, 17 April 2004

• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE
• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Toby A Inkster

Wednesday, 15 February 2017

• FW: (-Sucking-) connolly

Saturday, 17 April 2004

• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE

Wednesday, 15 February 2017

• FW: **Hot Movie** connolly

Friday, 16 April 2004

• Re: HTML 4.01 DTD Johannes Koch
• Re: HTML 4.01 DTD Satoshi ISHIKAWA
• Re: HTML 4.01 DTD ic
• HTML 4.01 DTD Robert van Loenhout

Thursday, 15 April 2004

• Re: [OT] link html to my web site David Dorward
• Re: [OT] link html to my web site David Woolley

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

• FW: **Hot Movie** connolly
• Fw: Virus Alert connolly

Thursday, 15 April 2004

• Next of Kin/Beneficiary. andybrown
• Re: link html to my web site David Dorward
• link html to my web site Lynda Keyes

Wednesday, 14 April 2004

• xhtml modularization Jewett, Jim J

Monday, 13 February 2017

• Fw: My Funny Ass connolly

Wednesday, 14 April 2004

• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• Re: Property list elements? Alan Plum
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) David Woolley
• Re: Property list elements? Jukka K. Korpela

Tuesday, 13 April 2004

• Property list elements? Edwin van Vliet
• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• Hi, it's me ij@w3.org
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Karl Dubost
• Re: complexity David Woolley

Monday, 12 April 2004

• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela
• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Ian Hickson
• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela
• RE: complexity Ian Hickson
• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Ian Hickson
• RE: complexity Jewett, Jim J
• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jewett, Jim J

Sunday, 11 April 2004

• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE
• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE
• Re: Behavior of <meta> elements linking in stylesheets David Woolley
• Re: Lets start a romantic affair Alan Plum
• Re: Behavior of <meta> elements linking in stylesheets Ernest Cline
• RE: Lets start a romantic affair Cyril

Saturday, 10 April 2004

• Re: Behavior of <meta> elements linking in stylesheets Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Behavior of <meta> elements linking in stylesheets Jukka K. Korpela
• [www-html] <none> hussein choueib
• Re: complexity olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 9 April 2004

• Hey dsr@w3.org
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: Simplicity of Concept olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: complexity Orion Adrian
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• Re: Simplicity of Concept Orion Adrian
• Re: complexity Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: complexity olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: Simplicity of Concept olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• RE: [Tables] Why not use the XFrames approach? Orion Adrian

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• [Tables] Why not use the XFrames approach? Alan Plum
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Ian Hickson
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Tantek Çelik
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) David Woolley
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) David Woolley
• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Bjoern Hoehrmann

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

• Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Tantek Çelik
• RE: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• RE: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) ic
• RE: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) Orion Adrian
• complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF) olafBuddenhagen@web.de

Monday, 8 March 2004

• Intercambio de enlaces Los Calaveras

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

• read it immediately ij@w3.org
• Re: XHTML and RDF Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 6 April 2004

• Re: opposite of em fantasai
• Re: opposite of em Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: opposite of em Tonico Strasser
• Re: opposite of em Toby A Inkster
• Hey dsr@w3.org
• Hi! dsr@w3.org
• Hi! dsr@w3.org
• unknown ij@w3.org
• Hi! dsr@w3.org
• Hi! dsr@w3.org
• Bad Gateway dsr@w3.org
• hey you dsr@w3.org
• Hi, it's me dsr@w3.org

Monday, 5 April 2004

• Re: opposite of em Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: opposite of em David Woolley
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Orion Adrian
• RE: opposite of em Jewett, Jim J
• Re: opposite of em Mikko Rantalainen
• RE: [Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs?] Orion Adrian
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs?] Alan Plum
• Re: Why bother using DTDs? Orion Adrian
• Re: [Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs?] Ian Hickson
• Re: Why bother using DTDs? Alan Plum
• [Fwd: RE: Why bother using DTDs?] Alan Plum
• [Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs?] Alan Plum
• [Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs?] Alan Plum
• Re: Why bother using DTDs? Ian Hickson
• Why bother using DTDs? Alan Plum

Sunday, 4 April 2004

• RE: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jewett, Jim J
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Orion Adrian
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question ( 2 ) olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... David Woolley
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela

Saturday, 3 April 2004

• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Ernest Cline
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: XHTML and RDF olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de

Friday, 2 April 2004

• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Orion Adrian
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• RE: opposite of em Orion Adrian
• RE: opposite of em Jewett, Jim J
• Web Hosting Resource Carlos Darius

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• Thank you for your correspondance... LCMSTORE
• Re: opposite of em David Woolley
• Re: opposite of em Tonico Strasser
• Re: opposite of em Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: opposite of em Masayasu Ishikawa

Tuesday, 30 March 2004

• opposite of em Tonico Strasser

Friday, 2 April 2004

• Re: <?import Andrew Clover

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• Re: nbsp and typography rules Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... Jukka K. Korpela
• <?import Ford, Allan
• Re: nbsp and typography rules Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question.... David Woolley

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:50:12 UTC