- From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 22:37:32 +0100
- To: Tonico Strasser <contact_tonico@yahoo.de>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 17:37:35 UTC
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 17:03, Tonico Strasser wrote: > Has anybody considered a new element that is simply the opposite of the > em (emphasis) element? I tend to use <small> for such purposes, and sometimes use CSS to change the rendering so that the text is regular-sized but de-emphasised in some other way (for example, is pale). I think it would be nice if <small> were left in XHTML 2 for this purpose, and that the spec specifically said that the default rendering for the element needn't be a reduced font size. (In many media -- tty or aural, for instance -- font size simply doesn't make sense anyway!) -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=132
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 17:37:35 UTC