- From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:28:19 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
> [Original Message] > From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> > > There is simply no sane way that you can have both > servers _and_ clients interpreting these tags. Actually there is a sane way. If a UA receives an HTML document that contains a <meta http-equiv=""> element via HTTP and the corresponding header was sent with it, ignore the <meta> element as the server has already taken care of it. If the <meta> doesn't match or contradicts an HTTP header then assume that the server did not use the <meta> to set the headers. (Assuming that the document does not contain two <meta>'s with the same attribute value for http-equiv of course, but it should be checking for that as well.) It is fairly easy for a client to detect if the server has honored the <meta http-equiv="">'s. Whether any actually do detect that is another matter.
Received on Saturday, 10 April 2004 23:28:19 UTC