w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from January to March 2000 by author

Andreas Schmidt

• Re: Scenarios/FAQ (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Tuesday, 4 January)

Barb Fox

• RE: KeyInfo and KeyValue (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)

Biron,Paul V

• RE: XML Schema WG response to the DSig Last Call WD (Friday, 24 March)
• XML Schema WG response to the DSig Last Call WD (Friday, 24 March)

bps11@ureach.com

• laser printer toner advertisement (Monday, 22 March)

Brian LaMacchia

• RE: KeyInfo and KeyValue (Wednesday, 15 March)
• KeyInfo and KeyValue (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)

Brown, Sam

• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Thursday, 16 March)

by way of

• Re: minor typos in WD-xmldsig-core-20000228 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 15 March)
• XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Tuesday, 14 March)
• [Moderator Action] Should alg spec be included in hashed data? (Monday, 24 January)
• signing xml documents (Thursday, 6 January)

by way of

• XML-encoding of SPKI Certificates (Wednesday, 15 March)

Carl Wallace

• Re: KeyInfo and KeyValue (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: KeyInfo and KeyValue (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: KeyInfo questions/comments (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)
• KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: X509Data (Wednesday, 1 March)
• X509Data (Tuesday, 29 February)
• draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-04 question (Monday, 21 February)

Christian Geuer-Pollmann

• Comments on 28022000 draft: Wrong URL (Friday, 3 March)
• Comments on 28022000 draft: Typos (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo? (Thursday, 2 March)

Christophe Vermeulen

• Re: Scenarios/FAQ (Tuesday, 18 January)

Christopher R. Maden

• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Xpath transform changes and questions (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 15 March)

Dan Connolly

• Re: A "plug/play" URI/IDREF proposal (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: fragment identifier as uri? (IDREF baggage) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: fragment identifier as uri? (Was: 000106 Minutes) (Tuesday, 1 February)

david.solo@citicorp.com

• RE: KeyInfo->KeyValue (Thursday, 24 February)
• RE: San Jose Agenda - regrets (Thursday, 20 January)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• XMLDSIG March 16th Con Call CONFIRMING CANCELATION (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: MimeType and charset (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Face to Face meeting Schedule CHANGE to April 20th in Victoria (Monday, 13 March)
• Face to Face meeting April 13th in Victoria (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Comments on 28022000 draft: Wrong URL (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Comments on 28022000 draft: Question regarding sec 6.3.1 (HMAC) (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-04 question (Monday, 21 February)
• XMLDSIG con call agenda 17 Feb 2000 (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Signatures draft (Wednesday, 16 February)
• IMPORTANT: Change in XMLDSIG telecon numbers (Wednesday, 16 February)
• Re: Signatures draft (Tuesday, 15 February)
• CORRECTED co-call schedule (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: Minutes: 00-February-03 (Friday, 4 February)
• XMLDSIG meeting at IETF Adelaide (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: fragment identifier as uri? (IDREF baggage) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: fragment identifier as uri? (Was: 000106 Minutes) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: XPath transform (Monday, 31 January)
• Further Updated current Section 8 (Friday, 28 January)
• Updated current Section 8 (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Revised current Section 7 (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Changes to current Section 7 (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Chair Announce: Telecon info (Tuesday, 25 January)
• suggest text re "Type", resend (Monday, 24 January)
• San Jose Agenda (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: Draft 04-January-2000: Errors and typos (Saturday, 15 January)
• suggest text re "Type" (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 (Thursday, 13 January)
• Co-Chair Move (Thursday, 6 January)

Donald Eastlake 3rd

• XMLDSIG March 16th Con Call Tentative Cancelation (Monday, 13 March)
• XMLDSIG Con Call agenda, 2 March 2000 (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Updated working group charter (Wednesday, 1 March)

Eastlake Donald-LDE008

• Tentative Agenda for Adelaide (Friday, 17 March)

Ed Simon

• RE: Comments on last call draft (BRAVO Kent!!!) (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: Comments on last call draft (Thursday, 16 March)
• Separate namespace for KeyInfo? (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: multilevel references (Monday, 28 February)
• RE: Faulty DTD of Object element (Friday, 25 February)
• RE: Faulty DTD of Object element (Wednesday, 23 February)
• MUST READ [Canonicalization] -- Draft of XML Signature's WG offi cial reaction to Canonical XML (Thursday, 3 February)
• W3C XML Canonicalization -- must read (Saturday, 22 January)
• RE: XPath transform (Monday, 17 January)

EKR

• Re: Comments on last call draft (BRAVO Kent!!!) (Tuesday, 28 March)

Eric Rescorla

• RetrievalMethod (Thursday, 16 March)

Gregor Karlinger

• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Thursday, 30 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Comments on new XPath Filtering proposal (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 22 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Comments on 28022000 draft: Canonicalization (Thursday, 2 March)
• Comments on 28022000 draft: Sec. 7.1 contradicts XML 1.0 (Thursday, 2 March)
• Comments on 28022000 draft: Question regarding sec 6.3.1 (HMAC) (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Comments on 28022000 draft: Lack of expressiveness in DTDs (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Comments on 28022000 draft: Lack of expressiveness in DTDs (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Comments on 28022000 draft: Error in 2.1 Simple example (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Comments on 28022000 draft: URI/IDREF (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Comments on 28022000 draft: Typos (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: X509Data (S/MIME Warning) (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: X509Data (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: KeyInfo->KeyValue (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: Faulty DTD of Object element (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: Faulty DTD of Object element (Friday, 25 February)
• Faulty DTD of Object element (Monday, 21 February)
• KeyInfo->KeyValue (Monday, 21 February)
• A "plug/play" URI/IDREF proposal (Thursday, 10 February)
• Which character encoding to use if null c14n is used? (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Draft 04-January-2000: Algorithm/Transform/Parameter (Wednesday, 12 January)
• The URI vs. IDREF problem (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Draft 04-January-2000: Errors and typos (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: Transforms useless in current spec (Tuesday, 11 January)
• [Fwd: 000106 Minutes] (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Signature definitions (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Tuesday, 4 January)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-05.txt (Tuesday, 29 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-04.txt (Thursday, 10 February)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-requirements-03.txt (Thursday, 3 February)

James Clark

• Re: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Thursday, 16 March)

jesica@web.com

• Expose your business to the Internet (Thursday, 30 March)

John Boyer

• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Wednesday, 29 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Wednesday, 29 March)
• XPath action item, was Re: Enveloped Signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Comments on new XPath Filtering proposal (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: I18N WG/IG last call comments (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Friday, 24 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Thursday, 23 March)
• Victoria Face-to-Face (Thursday, 23 March)
• RE: Xpath transform changes and questions (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: Xpath transform changes and questions (Saturday, 18 March)
• RE: Xpath transform changes and questions (Friday, 17 March)
• Xpath transform changes and questions (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: Comments on last call draft (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Face to Face meeting Schedule CHANGE to April 20th in Victoria (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: Comments on last call draft (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: Comments on last call draft (Saturday, 11 March)
• RE: Comments on last call draft (Thursday, 9 March)
• New transforms text (Monday, 14 February)
• [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> (Thursday, 3 February)
• RE: XPath transform (Monday, 31 January)
• RE: XPath transform (Wednesday, 26 January)
• RE: Thoughts on Threat Model (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Yes, RE: [Moderator Action] Should alg spec be included in hashed data? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Thoughts on Threat Model (Monday, 24 January)
• RE: XPath transform (Monday, 24 January)
• RE: Scenarios/FAQ (Tuesday, 18 January)
• RE: Scenarios/FAQ (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Scenarios/FAQ (Tuesday, 18 January)
• RE: XPath transform (Monday, 17 January)
• RE: XPath transform (Friday, 14 January)
• RE: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 (Thursday, 13 January)
• RE: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 (Thursday, 13 January)
• RE: Transforms useless in current spec (Wednesday, 12 January)
• RE: Transforms useless in current spec (Wednesday, 12 January)
• RE: Transforms useless in current spec (Tuesday, 11 January)
• RE: Signature definitions (Monday, 10 January)
• Transforms useless in current spec (Monday, 10 January)
• Signature definitions (Monday, 10 January)
• RE: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Wednesday, 5 January)
• RE: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Monday, 3 January)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Xpath transform changes and questions (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: Xpath transform changes and questions (Saturday, 18 March)
• RE: Xpath transform changes and questions (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Tuesday, 14 March)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Comments on last call draft (BRAVO Kent!!!) (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Sunday, 26 March)
• XHTML Extended Forms Requirements (Thursday, 16 March)
• Scnearious and FAQ (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Minutes 2000-March-02 (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo? (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo? (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Comments on Last Call XML Signature Specification (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: Comments on 28022000 draft: Lack of expressiveness in DTDs (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Last Call Errors (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Last Call XML Signature Specification (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Faulty DTD of Object element (Friday, 25 February)
• Comments on Canonical XML (Saturday, 19 February)
• Candidate Last Call (Friday, 18 February)
• Minutes of 000217-tele (Thursday, 17 February)
• latest editorial draft and potential agenda items (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Signatures draft (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: A "plug/play" URI/IDREF proposal (Friday, 11 February)
• Signature WG Comments to XML WG (Friday, 11 February)
• Latest Draft (We are going to Last Call soon!) and Minority Reports (Wednesday, 9 February)
• Minutes: 00-February-03 (Thursday, 3 February)
• Call Tomorrow and Latest Draft (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: fragment identifier as uri? (Was: 000106 Minutes) (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: Which character encoding to use if null c14n is used? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Thoughts on Threat Model (Tuesday, 25 January)
• FTF Draft Minutes (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: W3C XML Canonicalization -- must read (Monday, 24 January)
• Last Call for Canonical XML (Thursday, 20 January)
• RE: San Jose Agenda - regrets (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Chair Announce: Last Draft before FTF (Monday, 17 January)
• Chair Announce: Last Draft before FTF (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: Draft 04-January-2000: Errors and typos (Friday, 14 January)
• Canonical XML Last Call (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: Signature definitions (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Chair Announce: FTF Confirmed Attendees and Goals (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Signature definitions (Monday, 10 January)
• Signature example that is DTD and schema valid (Friday, 7 January)
• 000106 Minutes (Thursday, 6 January)
• RE: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Wednesday, 5 January)
• Call Tomorrow 00/01/04 (NOTE: New number) (Wednesday, 5 January)
• CA: latest draft available 20000104 (Tuesday, 4 January)
• RE: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF (Tuesday, 4 January)

Juha Pääjärvi

• Last Call Comment: Canonicalization (Sunday, 26 March)

julie23@smallbizmail.com

• Email Advertising Special--Ends Friday (Monday, 27 March)

Malte Borcherding

• Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo? (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo? (Thursday, 2 March)

Mark Bartel

• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Friday, 24 March)
• RE: draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-04 question (Monday, 21 February)

Martin J. Duerst

• I18N WG/IG last call comments (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Thursday, 23 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Wednesday, 22 March)
• RE: Xpath transform changes and questions (Wednesday, 22 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: Xpath transform changes and questions (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: MimeType and charset (Thursday, 16 March)
• MimeType and charset (Tuesday, 14 March)

Mary_Ellen_Zurko@iris.com

• NSPW 2000 Call For Papers (Wednesday, 26 January)

Matthew Appler

• RE: KeyInfo questions/comments (Tuesday, 14 March)

Peter Hesse

• RE: KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: KeyInfo questions/comments (Monday, 13 March)

Peter Lipp

• AW: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• AW: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• AW: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• AW: Object References containing nondterministic behaviour (Tuesday, 28 March)
• AW: Separate namespace for KeyInfo? (Thursday, 2 March)
• AW: FTF Draft Minutes (Tuesday, 25 January)
• AW: Thoughts on Threat Model (Tuesday, 25 January)
• AW: Thoughts on Threat Model (Tuesday, 25 January)
• AW: Transforms useless in current spec (Wednesday, 12 January)
• AW: Transforms useless in current spec (Wednesday, 12 January)

Petteri Stenius

• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Thursday, 23 March)
• Enveloped signatures and XPath (Wednesday, 22 March)

Philip Hallam-Baker

• RE: Comments on last call draft (BRAVO Kent!!!) (Thursday, 23 March)
• RE: Which character encoding to use if null c14n is used? (Wednesday, 26 January)

Reiner Hüttl

• Object References containing nondterministic behaviour (Monday, 27 March)
• multilevel references (Monday, 28 February)

Smiley, David

• RE: San Jose Agenda - regrets (Thursday, 20 January)

TAMURA Kent

• Re: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Tuesday, 28 March)
• C14n before XPath (Re: Enveloped signatures and XPath) (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Xpath transform changes and questions (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: Comments on last call draft (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: Comments on last call draft (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: Comments on last call draft (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: Comments on last call draft (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Comments on last call draft (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Comments on last call draft (Friday, 10 March)
• Comments on last call draft (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: XPath transform (Monday, 31 January)
• Re: XPath transform (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: XPath transform (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: An implementation (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: XPath transform (Monday, 17 January)
• XPath transform (Friday, 14 January)
• An implementation (Wednesday, 5 January)

tgindin@us.ibm.com

• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Thursday, 30 March)
• RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: Comments on last call draft (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Signatures draft (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Signatures draft (Monday, 14 February)

The IESG

• Last Call: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing to Proposed Standard (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Document Action: XML-Signature Requirements to Informational (Wednesday, 9 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 March 2000 07:01:42 UTC