- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:38:55 -0500
- To: Gregor.Karlinger@iaik.at
- Cc: John Boyer <jboyer@uwi.com>, DSig Group <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 12:03 00/01/11 +0100, Gregor Karlinger wrote: >As an alternative approach, consider to label the types which a data entity >to be signed could have, in relation to its signature: Gregor, thanks for the comment. I sort of tried this approach when I realized the qualifier was sometimes referring to the signature, and sometimes to the data. However, it ended up leading to rather awkward grammatical constructs in the sentences of the spec. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2000 14:41:00 UTC