- From: Martin J. Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:53:18 +0900
- To: "John Boyer" <jboyer@PureEdge.com>, "TAMURA Kent" <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@exemplary.net>, "James Clark" <jjc@jclark.com>
At 00/03/17 12:47 -0800, John Boyer wrote: iii) If everything else checks out, we can get rid of exact order and just >use lex order provided that lex ordering in UTF-16 results in the same order >as lex ordering in UTF-8 (which is Christopher Maden's claim). This is not true. Surrogate pairs are the counterexample. And of course it is not true for any other character encoding, except in a very limited sense for iso-8859-1 and us-ascii. Regards, Martin.
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2000 02:55:27 UTC