- From: John Boyer <jboyer@PureEdge.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:10:44 -0800
- To: <tgindin@us.ibm.com>, <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
- Cc: "Peter Lipp" <Peter.Lipp@iaik.at>, "''IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG \(E-mail\) ' '" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Hi Tom, The proposal is only to exclude Signature elements that are ancestor to the DigestValue element whose content is being calculated. This does not impact one's ability to sign someone else's signature. However, I'm sure this has been asked and answered negatively in the past. John Boyer Software Development Manager PureEdge Solutions, Inc. (formerly UWI.Com) Creating Binding E-Commerce jboyer@PureEdge.com -----Original Message----- From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of tgindin@us.ibm.com Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 10:57 AM To: gregor.karlinger@iaik.at Cc: Peter Lipp; ''IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG (E-mail) ' ' Subject: RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath Is the proposal here that all elements within a <Signature> should be excluded unless they are the objects of a Reference? If so, how would a subsequent signer include the KeyInfo or SignatureValue from an enveloped signature unless the original signer had attached an ID to them? Tom Gindin
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2000 14:09:36 UTC