Re: fragment identifier as uri? (Was: 000106 Minutes)

"Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" wrote:
> 
> I've been thining about this some more and believe we should just go
> with what all normal people think of as a URI.

Good. I think you'll be glad you did.

[...]

> I don't see the non-validating parser / absence of a DTD as that much
> of a problem

more on that separately...


-- 
Dan Connolly
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 31 January 2000 23:17:58 UTC