uri@w3.org from November 2006 by date

Tuesday, 21 November 2006

• Returned mail: see transcript for details mark.davis@jtcsv.com

Sunday, 19 November 2006

• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Graham Klyne
• Re: [Uri-review] Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann

Thursday, 16 November 2006

• RE: uri-template: optional template parameters? Mike Schinkel
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Tony Hansen
• Re: URI Template Status? James M Snell
• RE: Comments about URI Templates Mike Schinkel
• RE: URI Template Status? Mike Schinkel

Wednesday, 15 November 2006

• Re: URI Template Status? James M Snell
• RE: URI Template Status? Mike Schinkel
• Re: uri-template: optional template parameters? Marc Hadley
• Re: snews 4395-review Frank Ellermann
• Re: Comments about URI Templates James M Snell
• Re: URI Template Status? James M Snell
• Re: uri-template: optional template parameters? Eric J. Bowman
• Comments about URI Templates Mike Schinkel
• Re: uri-template: optional template parameters? Mark Nottingham
• URI Template Status? Mike Schinkel
• Re: snews 4395-review Charles Lindsey
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Jerome Louvel
• uri-template: optional template parameters? Eric J. Bowman

Monday, 13 November 2006

• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 James M Snell

Friday, 10 November 2006

• Re: snews 4395-review Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Uri-review] snews 4395-review Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Uri-review] Re: The 'javascript' scheme John Cowan
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Marc Hadley
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Mark Baker
• snews 4395-review Frank Ellermann
• Side discussion of tel: and mailto: (was: The 'javascript' scheme) Graham Klyne
• Re: [Uri-review] Re: The 'javascript' scheme Graham Klyne
• Singular vs. Plural? Mike Schinkel
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Julian Reschke
• Re: [Uri-review] Re: The 'javascript' scheme Martin Duerst
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Marc Hadley
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 9 November 2006

• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 James M Snell
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Joe Gregorio
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 James M Snell
• Re: Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Marc Hadley
• Rolled up Feedback on draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00 Joe Gregorio
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Paul Hoffman
• Re: [Uri-review] Re: The 'javascript' scheme Martin Duerst
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Graham Klyne
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 8 November 2006

• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Paul Hoffman
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Marc Manthey
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Graham Klyne
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Julian Reschke
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 7 November 2006

• Re: some questions about RFC3986 Mike Brown

Sunday, 5 November 2006

• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Paul Hoffman
• Re: FYI: fresh news-nntp-uri drafts Frank Ellermann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Paul Hoffman
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: FYI: fresh news-nntp-uri drafts Nicolas Krebs
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Frank Ellermann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann

Saturday, 4 November 2006

• Re: some questions about RFC3986 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Frank Ellermann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: The 'javascript' scheme Frank Ellermann

Thursday, 2 November 2006

• Re: some questions about RFC3986 Mike Brown

Wednesday, 1 November 2006

• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-duerst-mailto-bis-03.txt Frank Ellermann

Last message date: Tuesday, 21 November 2006 20:20:56 UTC