W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > November 2006

Re: The 'javascript' scheme

From: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 14:50:17 -0800
Message-Id: <p06240805c1741a4da1eb@[12.105.246.138]>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: uri@w3.org, uri-review@ietf.org

At 11:10 PM +0100 11/5/06, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>In the end there are no non-trivial rules
>that I could reinforce.

Your view of "trivial" and that of the readers of this future spec 
probably differ. Don't forget that half of the readers of this spec 
will have below-average understanding of URIs; please consider them 
when you decide whether or not there should be a set of simple good 
and bad examples.

FWIW, I regularly get letters from implementers who don't understand 
the rules for mailto:, even though they are just as trivial as those 
in this document. Just one data point, of course...
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 22:50:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC