Re: The 'javascript' scheme

At 11:10 PM +0100 11/5/06, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>In the end there are no non-trivial rules
>that I could reinforce.

Your view of "trivial" and that of the readers of this future spec 
probably differ. Don't forget that half of the readers of this spec 
will have below-average understanding of URIs; please consider them 
when you decide whether or not there should be a set of simple good 
and bad examples.

FWIW, I regularly get letters from implementers who don't understand 
the rules for mailto:, even though they are just as trivial as those 
in this document. Just one data point, of course...

Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 22:50:43 UTC