Graham Klyne schrieb: > I have rather mixed feelings about this proposal. > > On one hand, it clearly describes a common practice that is better documented > than not, and as such is to be welcomed. > > On the other hand, I struggle to see how a javascript: URI-like string can be > conceived as a "resource identifier" in the sense of RFC3986: > ... +1 It's probably good to document it, but maybe to actually claim that is a URI is a mistake. Best regards, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 15:32:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC