W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > November 2006

Re: The 'javascript' scheme

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:26:10 +0100
Message-ID: <4551F712.90907@gmx.de>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, uri@w3.org, uri-review@ietf.org

Graham Klyne schrieb:
> I have rather mixed feelings about this proposal.
> 
> On one hand, it clearly describes a common practice that is better documented
> than not, and as such is to be welcomed.
> 
> On the other hand, I struggle to see how a javascript: URI-like string can be
> conceived as a "resource identifier" in the sense of RFC3986:
 > ...

+1

It's probably good to document it, but maybe to actually claim that is a 
URI is a mistake.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 15:32:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC