Re: The 'javascript' scheme

Graham Klyne schrieb:
> I have rather mixed feelings about this proposal.
> 
> On one hand, it clearly describes a common practice that is better documented
> than not, and as such is to be welcomed.
> 
> On the other hand, I struggle to see how a javascript: URI-like string can be
> conceived as a "resource identifier" in the sense of RFC3986:
 > ...

+1

It's probably good to document it, but maybe to actually claim that is a 
URI is a mistake.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 15:32:59 UTC