W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > November 2006

RE: URI Template Status?

From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:18:54 -0500
To: "'James M Snell'" <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: <uri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001f01c708e2$8f5c2400$0702a8c0@Guides.local>

Thank you for the explanation.  Any thoughts on whether you'll go with
Standards Track or Experimental RFC?

Also, can you clarify what's required for "two demonstratably interoperable
implementations?"

-Mike Schinkel
http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/
http://www.welldesignedurls.org/


-----Original Message-----
From: James M Snell [mailto:jasnell@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 11:32 AM
To: Mike Schinkel
Cc: uri@w3.org
Subject: Re: URI Template Status?

The next step is to iterate through a few versions of the I-D then see if
there is enough interest/consensus in pursuing either a Standards Track or
Experimental RFC. For Standards Track, we need at least two demonstratably
interoperable implementations and an obvious consensus that what we're
putting forward for standardization is technically complete with no
significant issues.  Given that this is an individual submission (i.e. it's
not the product of a working group) then the process for moving forward
through the process is rather informal and moves along at whatever pace the
authors want to move it along.

- James
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 21:13:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:10 UTC