uri@w3.org from September 2003 by date

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

Announcement: The "info" URI scheme Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)
Re: IETF Draft on mmsto: Daniel Brockman

Monday, 29 September 2003

Re: IETF Draft on mmsto: Ted Wugofski
RE: IETF Draft on mmsto: Bennett.Marks@nokia.com
Re: IETF Draft on mmsto: Ted Wugofski
Re: IETF Draft on mmsto: Daniel Brockman
IETF Draft on mmsto: Bennett.Marks@nokia.com
Re: definition of "character" Graham Klyne
RE: encoding related phrasing McDonald, Ira

Saturday, 27 September 2003

Re: encoding related phrasing Roy T. Fielding
RE: definition of "character" McDonald, Ira
RE: encoding related phrasing McDonald, Ira
Re: definition of "character" Dan Connolly
Re: definition of "character" Dan Connolly
Re: definition of "character" Sandro Hawke
Re: definition of "character" Mike Brown

Friday, 26 September 2003

Re: definition of "character" Dan Connolly
Re: encoding related phrasing Mike Brown
definition of "character" by way of Martin Duerst
encoding related phrasing by way of Martin Duerst
example recommended for escaping ASCII vs non-ASCII by way of Martin Duerst

Thursday, 25 September 2003

Re: delimiters vs separators by way of Martin Duerst
Re: delimiters vs separators Al Gilman
Wikipedia URI entry - review, borrow ideas from? by way of Martin Duerst
schemes like 'file' changing resolution rules by way of Martin Duerst
suggestions for path component clarification by way of Martin Duerst
delimiters vs separators by way of Martin Duerst

Monday, 22 September 2003

mms uri schemes Ted Wugofski
Re: #foo URI references Paul Grosso

Friday, 19 September 2003

Escaping issues David Hopwood

Saturday, 20 September 2003

Re: #foo URI references John Cowan
Re: #foo URI references Roy T. Fielding
Re: #foo URI references Al Gilman
RE: Are we losing the plot? Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)
Re: #foo URI references John Cowan
Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-03 Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 19 September 2003

Re: #foo URI references Roy T. Fielding
RE: Are we losing the plot? Daniel R. Tobias
RE: Are we losing the plot? Larry Masinter

Thursday, 18 September 2003

Re: URNs for 'naming authority assignment', not 'permanent' Sam X. Sun (@s2000)
RE: URNs for 'naming authority assignment', not 'permanent' Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

RE: URNs for 'naming authority assignment', not 'permanent' Daniel R. Tobias
Are we losing the plot? Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)
RE: URNs for 'naming authority assignment', not 'permanent' Williams, Stuart
RE: URNs for 'naming authority assignment', not 'permanent' Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

URNs for 'naming authority assignment', not 'permanent' Larry Masinter
[uri] <none> Williams, Stuart
URNs and URIs Larry Masinter

Saturday, 13 September 2003

Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Sam X. Sun (h)

Friday, 12 September 2003

Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Michael Mealling
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Larry Lannom
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree hardie@qualcomm.com
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree John Cowan
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Dan Connolly
info, doi, short names, and registration services Larry Masinter
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Michael Mealling
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Michael Mealling
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Larry Lannom
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Daniel R. Tobias
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Al Gilman

Thursday, 11 September 2003

Re: uddi scheme (and informal scheme indexes) Dan Connolly
Re: URI scheme listing for doi Dan Connolly
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree hardie@qualcomm.com
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree John Cowan
Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree Larry Lannom
RE: DOI and the non-IETF tree hardie@qualcomm.com
RE: DOI and the non-IETF tree Paskin, Norman (DOI-ELS)

Wednesday, 10 September 2003

RE: prs-/vnd- not broad enough; how about "ext-" McDonald, Ira
prs-/vnd- not broad enough; how about "ext-" Sandro Hawke

Monday, 8 September 2003

draft-black-snmp-uri-00.txt Paul Hoffman / IMC
RE: Question re: URIs Graham Klyne
Re: Question re: URIs John Manko
RE: Question re: URIs Larry Masinter
Re: Question re: URIs Sandro Hawke

Sunday, 7 September 2003

Re: Question re: URIs connolly@w3.org

Saturday, 6 September 2003

Question re: URIs Mark Nottingham
RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)
RE: DOI and the non-IETF tree Larry Masinter

Friday, 5 September 2003

RE: DOI and the non-IETF tree Larry Masinter
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-00.txt Tim Bray
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-00.txt Larry Masinter

Thursday, 4 September 2003

Re: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Tim Bray
Re: uddi scheme (and informal scheme indexes) Dan Connolly
Re: uddi scheme Mark Nottingham
RE: uddi scheme McDonald, Ira
uddi scheme Mark Nottingham
RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Eamonn Neylon
RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Williams, Stuart
RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Williams, Stuart

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Eric Hellman
RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Re: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Tim Bray
RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? Williams, Stuart
URI scheme listing for doi Paskin, Norman (DOI-ELS)
Re: windows example not so weird [was: Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-00.txt] John Cowan
Re: windows example not so weird [was: Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-00.txt] Israel Viente

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

windows example not so weird [was: Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-00.txt] Al Gilman
Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc1738bis-00.txt by way of Martin Duerst
DOI and the non-IETF tree Paskin, Norman (DOI-ELS)

Sunday, 31 August 2003

Re: URI reference to a directory (what do you want to do?) Daniel R. Tobias

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 10:29:49 UTC