W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > September 2003

Re: uddi scheme (and informal scheme indexes)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:16:53 -0500
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>, uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <1063322213.9839.13.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 12:51, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 11:47, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >  From http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes.html:
> > 
> > [[[ This is (an attempt at) an exhaustive list of URI schemes. We try 
> > to list them all, whether they're standard or not.
[...]
> I'm inclined to retire the page and say "please
> let uri@w3.org know about any schemes you find,
> and try to get their authors to register officially".

I did in fact retire it today.
$Revision: 1.91 $ of $Date: 2003/09/11 22:32:28 $

> Another possibility is add something like
> "Good URIs don't use UnregisteredUriSchemes"
> to the wiki topic http://esw.w3.org/topic/GoodURIs
> and collaborate on why UnregisteredUriSchemes
> is an AntiPattern.

I started that going... see
  http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes
and the 83 subtopics from the old list, plus the
2 new ones: doi and uddi
  http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes_2fdoi
  http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes_2fuddi

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 19:16:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:06 UTC