W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > September 2003

Re: DOI and the non-IETF tree

From: Daniel R. Tobias <dan@tobias.name>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:27:55 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20030912072752.0556d350@localhost>
To: uri@w3.org




On 11 Sep 2003 at 20:54, Al Gilman wrote:

 > DOI sounds like a second run at defining URNs that seems to have
 > acquired a following and demonstrated interoperable practice.

But shouldn't it be "urn:doi:" instead of just "doi:"?  If it's URN-
like, why not make it an actual URN?

--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
Received on Friday, 12 September 2003 07:36:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:06 UTC