- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:42:46 -0500
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
At 19:08 2003 09 20 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >Roy T. Fielding scripsit: > >> >The semantic change is to extend #foo semantics to BASE#foo >> >URI-references. >> >> That's odd -- I would call that a behavioral change, since the meaning >> of the link hasn't changed at all; I only selected one of the ways the >> link could be satisfied and made it the standard. Before it was left >> up to the application. > >Fair enough. So the special interpretation of "#foo" in the resource >denoted by "http://www.example.com/blargh" is extended to "blargh#foo" >and "http://www.example.com/blargh#foo" as well. > >But it seems to me that (for good or ill) this also means that if a >base URI is available, say "http://www.example.com/stat/blargh", then >"#foo" now means "http://www.example.com/stat/blargh#foo". > >Is this a correct reading of 2396 bis? And if John is reading it correctly (he is reading it as I did), then this is the crux of my problem with it. paul
Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 11:44:49 UTC