public-wsc-wg@w3.org from May 2008 by date

Saturday, 31 May 2008

• ACTION-453: Initial draft of sec. cons. EV mixed with DV Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen

Friday, 30 May 2008

• Re: Eye tracking study of Firefox EV indicators Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: Eye tracking study of Firefox EV indicators Mary Ellen Zurko
• WSC Open Action Items Mary Ellen Zurko

Thursday, 29 May 2008

• Re: Debian SSL key generation vs Revocation and Expiration Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen

Wednesday, 28 May 2008

• Agenda: APWG debrief? Thomas Roessler
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-28 Ian Fette

Tuesday, 27 May 2008

• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-28 Joe Steele
• Re: Eye tracking study of Firefox EV indicators Johnathan Nightingale
• Re: TLS error handling in XMLHttpRequest Anne van Kesteren
• Re: TLS error handling in XMLHttpRequest Anne van Kesteren
• Re: TLS error handling in XMLHttpRequest Thomas Roessler
• Re: TLS error handling in XMLHttpRequest Anne van Kesteren
• Debian SSL key generation vs Revocation and Expiration Thomas Roessler

Friday, 23 May 2008

• usability claims and issues for potential testing of petnames Close, Tyler J.
• Re: Eye tracking study of Firefox EV indicators Mike Beltzner

Thursday, 22 May 2008

• Re: Eye tracking study of Firefox EV indicators Ian Fette
• Eye tracking study of Firefox EV indicators Rachna Dhamija
• Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-28 Mary Ellen Zurko
• ACTION-455 Resolution, I think Johnathan Nightingale

Wednesday, 21 May 2008

• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-21 Serge Egelman
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-21 Anil Saldhana

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-21 Thomas Roessler
• Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-21 Mary Ellen Zurko

Friday, 16 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-116 ReconfigureChrome Should users be able to reconfigure primary chrome? Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ISSUE-116 ReconfigureChrome Should users be able to reconfigure primary chrome? Anil Saldhana
• WSC Open Action Items Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: TLS error handling in XMLHttpRequest Thomas Roessler
• Re: TLS error handling in XMLHttpRequest Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

• ISSUE-212 (low chrome): devices and low-chrome mode [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: ISSUE-206 (Smartphones): Proposed changes/additions [wsc-xit] Luis Barriga
• ISSUE-211 (Derived secrets SHOULD): Make 8.3 SHOULD not must [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-210 (Warning Fatigue): Add section 9.5 - Warning Fatigue [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-206 (Smartphones): Smartphone Considerations [wsc-xit] Jan Vidar Krey
• ISSUE-209 (Typos): Spellchecking time [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-208 (human readable names): Add security consideration for "human readable" names - e.g. petnames [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-207 (identity, not security): Add Section 9.3 - Certificates assure identity, not security [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-206 (Smartphones): Smartphone Considerations [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-205 (OCSP Failure Risk): Add security consideration for OCSP failure Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-204 (nosqbrackets): Drop square brackets in section 6.1.1 [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-203 (securityconsiderations): Update Security Considerations [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ACTION-438: saved TLS state and pinning Thomas Roessler
• RE: ISSUE-133 -- How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? Joe Steele
• Re: ACTION-430: Minor editorials Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ISSUE-183, ISSUE-169 Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ACTION-417: investigate completeness of error handling wrt TLS extensions Mary Ellen Zurko
• petname refinement RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ISSUE-198 (Be the user's agent and do their bidding): 6.4.4 Danger messages should not strictly forbid user agents from doing the user's bidding [wsc-xit] Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: ISSUE-133 -- How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ISSUE-183: Automatic Selfsigned Certificate acceptance/probation MUST NOT be implemented unless there is a history capability [wsc-xit] Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: ISSUE-197 (rm -rf petnames): Remove petnames [wsc-xit] Mary Ellen Zurko

Tuesday, 13 May 2008

• RE: ISSUE-197 (rm -rf petnames): Remove petnames [wsc-xit] Close, Tyler J.
• Re: ISSUE-198 (Be the user's agent and do their bidding): 6.4.4 Danger messages should not strictly forbid user agents from doing the user's bidding [wsc-xit] Ian Fette
• Re: ISSUE-198 (Be the user's agent and do their bidding): 6.4.4 Danger messages should not strictly forbid user agents from doing the user's bidding [wsc-xit] Serge Egelman
• ACTION-430: Minor editorials Luis Barriga
• TLS error handling in XMLHttpRequest Thomas Roessler
• ISSUE-202: Conformance model section makes outdated assumption about spec content [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-201: Status recording for revocation checks? [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-200: Should an AA security indication include all elements in the evaluation, or just the top document [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-199 (xmlhttprequest-tls): WebAPI does not specify any TLS error handling for XMLHttpRequest [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-198 (Be the user's agent and do their bidding): 6.4.4 Danger messages should not strictly forbid user agents from doing the user's bidding [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-197 (rm -rf petnames): Remove petnames [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: ISSUE-133 -- How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? Joe Steele
• RE: ISSUE-133 -- How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? Joe Steele

Monday, 12 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-183, ISSUE-169 Joe Steele
• Re: ISSUE-183: Automatic Selfsigned Certificate acceptance/probation MUST NOT be implemented unless there is a history capability [wsc-xit] Anil Saldhana

Sunday, 11 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-183: Automatic Selfsigned Certificate acceptance/probation MUST NOT be implemented unless there is a history capability [wsc-xit] Anil Saldhana

Friday, 9 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-169 Section 5.5.3 creates a burden on browsers to remember past certificates Stephen Farrell
• Re: ISSUE-169 Section 5.5.3 creates a burden on browsers to remember past certificates Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ACTION-417: investigate completeness of error handling wrt TLS extensions Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ISSUE-169 Section 5.5.3 creates a burden on browsers to remember past certificates Thomas Roessler
• Re: ISSUE-169 Section 5.5.3 creates a burden on browsers to remember past certificates Johnathan Nightingale
• Re: ISSUE-169 Section 5.5.3 creates a burden on browsers to remember past certificates Thomas Roessler
• ISSUE-169 Section 5.5.3 creates a burden on browsers to remember past certificates Mary Ellen Zurko

Wednesday, 7 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-190: axe relaxed path validation? Stephen Farrell
• ISSUE-190: axe relaxed path validation? Thomas Roessler
• Re: ACTION-417: investigate completeness of error handling wrt TLS extensions Stephen Farrell
• Re: ACTION-417: investigate completeness of error handling wrt TLS extensions Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen
• ACTION-417: investigate completeness of error handling wrt TLS extensions Stephen Farrell
• Re: ISSUE-133 -- How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? Mary Ellen Zurko

Tuesday, 6 May 2008

• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-07 Timothy Hahn
• RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-04-30 Close, Tyler J.
• ISSUE-133 -- How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? Joe Steele
• Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-05-07 Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: Larry Seltzer on the Green Bar (IE versus Opera) Dan Schutzer

Monday, 5 May 2008

• Larry Seltzer on the Green Bar (IE versus Opera) michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2008-04-16 Thomas Roessler

Friday, 2 May 2008

• ISSUE-190 relaxedpathvalidation Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended? Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ISSUE-138 Downgrade strength of Issuer field's Organization attribute Ian Fette
• Re: ISSUE-138 Downgrade strength of Issuer field's Organization attribute Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ISSUE-138 Downgrade strength of Issuer field's Organization attribute Johnathan Nightingale
• Re: ISSUE-138 Downgrade strength of Issuer field's Organization attribute Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ISSUE-138 Downgrade strength of Issuer field's Organization attribute Ian Fette
• Re: ISSUE-138 Downgrade strength of Issuer field's Organization attribute Johnathan Nightingale
• ISSUE-138 Downgrade strength of Issuer field's Organization attribute Mary Ellen Zurko
• ISSUE-196 (RemoveEmptiness): Remove Conformance Labels section [wsc-xit] Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
• WSC Open Action Items Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ACTION-416 open Draft proposal for slightly stricter variant of relaxed and basic Phillip Hallam-Baker 2008-04-23 Mary Ellen Zurko

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2008 19:31:44 UTC