- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 09:34:37 -0400
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFF32B9524.D1853A2D-ON8525744B.004347F5-8525744F.004A9497@LocalDomain>
Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda Calling information: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080521 Agenda 1) Pick a scribe http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes 2) Approve minutes from meetings http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-wsc-minutes.html 3) Weekly completed action items (Usually checkpointed Friday am, US East Coast time) [pending review] ACTION-415: Anil Saldhana to Add above text to 5.5.1 TLS errors - due 2008-05-08 [pending review] ACTION-417: Stephen Farrell to investigate completeness of error handling wrt TLS extensions - due 2008-05-15 [pending review] ACTION-422: Anil Saldhana to Incorporate Stephen's suggested change/clarification - due 2008-05-16 [pending review] ACTION-423: Anil Saldhana to incorporate DangerWillRobinson - due 2008-05-16 [pending review] ACTION-424: Anil Saldhana to Clean comments out of wsc-xit - due 2008-05-23 [pending review] ACTION-428: Anil Saldhana to Incorporate ISSUE-183 def to spec - due 2008-05-29 [pending review] ACTION-431: Mary Ellen Zurko to Draft plugin-related elaboration text (section 4ish?) - due 2008-05-20 [pending review] ACTION-432: Anil Saldhana to Incorporate the changed industry standard to practices text - due 2008-05-20 [pending review] ACTION-433: Anil Saldhana to Change robustness-apis-obscure-security-ui to include For visual user agents, browser chrome SHOULD always be present to signal security context information. This requirement does not apply when UI is explicitly dismissed by the user, e.g. by switching to full screen mode." - due 2008-05-20 [pending review] ACTION-438: Thomas Roessler to Draft alternate text around requiring saved SSL state - due 2008-05-20 [pending review] ACTION-444: Thomas Roessler to Take XHR-over-https questions to webapi - due 2008-05-20 [pending review] ACTION-471: Thomas Roessler to Replace text in 6.1.1 and 6.3 as drafted above. - due 2008-05-21 4) Open Action Items http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008May/0071.html 5) Action items closed due to inactivity None. 6) Agenda bashing 7) Usability Testing Sketch out our UT plans What will we test for? How will get get participants? Timeline? Responsibilities? 8) Next meeting - 28 May 2008 Topics for future meetings, carried over from the Oslo agenda: Test development Thomas to lead Test plans, sites to test against, test execution, etc. Some amount of test planning is needed for CR entry. Doing the testing is needed for CR exit. Conforming Implementations Needed for CR exit. We may cover this in test development. We'll need at least two conforming implementations to test against. What's in the pipeline, what can we expect in terms of MUSTs, SHOULDs, etc. Will we have gaps? What else beyond June? What, if anything, other than taking wsc-xit through LC to CR entry to CR exit (to recommendation) would we like to do after June? What would we be capable of doing? What should we, or someone like us, do? Some ideas: o Authoring best practices for (usably) secured sites. Some of the things we've wanted to recommend haven't been obviously in the scope of enabling security context information for user trust decisions. Should we ask for a charter clarification/change or new WG to do this? o Dealing with mixed content (there's some feeling that there might be more to do here). o Providing guidance or expertise to other standards efforts that touch on usable security. Can we provide guidance on how to deal with user expectations and implications when protocol security is designed/standardized? To do? Not to do?
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 13:35:26 UTC