RE: ISSUE-197 (rm -rf petnames): Remove petnames [wsc-xit]

Ian misunderstood the first sentence; the resolution was to clarify that 
support of petnames is a MAY by making the first sentence clearer. 

          Mez





From:
"Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com>
To:
Web Security Context Working Group WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
05/13/2008 06:07 PM
Subject:
RE: ISSUE-197 (rm -rf petnames): Remove petnames [wsc-xit]




I'm amused by the apparent lack of irony in the use of command line syntax 
to kill a proposal which aims to create a user friendly interface to X.509 
identifiers.

Will this issue be discussed at the Wednesday f2f meeting? If so, at what 
time? Does the scorched earth policy ("in its entirety and references 
thereto") represent any emerging consensus in the WG, or is this just Ian 
being Ian?

Thanks,
--Tyler

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] 
On Behalf Of Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 1:56 AM
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-197 (rm -rf petnames): Remove petnames [wsc-xit]



ISSUE-197 (rm -rf petnames): Remove petnames [wsc-xit]

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/

Raised by: Ian Fette
On product: wsc-xit

Remove 5.1.6 in its entirety and references thereto for June