- From: Close, Tyler J. <tyler.close@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 18:26:32 +0000
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- CC: "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Hi Mez, I was still in China, after WWW 2008, last week and so wasn't available to respond your pleadings to complete ACTION-407. Rather than close this one out without action, I think we can complete it. > 5) Action items closed due to inactivity > [pending review] ACTION-407: Tyler Close to Refine petname proposal in light of 2008-03-19 call's > discussion - due 2008-03-26 As I recall, ACTION-407 was asking for text to address Stephen Farell's point that there needed to be language saying that the petname presentation must be distinguished from presentation of other names. I suggest the paragraph that currently says: "Presentation of a petname MUST support renaming and deleting of a petname binding." Be expanded to something like: "Presentation of a petname MUST be distinguished from presentation of other names to enable discrimination between a user chosen petname and a name chosen by another party, or for another purpose. This presentation MUST also support renaming and deleting of a petname binding." I guess the best we could do for conformance testing of the above requirement is checking that no other kind of name in the presentation has exactly the same presentation as a petname. --Tyler
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 18:28:05 UTC