Re: ISSUE-116 ReconfigureChrome Should users be able to reconfigure primary chrome?

hmmmm. Section 7 is Robustness, and this isn't a robustness technique. I'd 
lean towards it's own subsection in Section 6. 


> 
> Where in XIT is this proposed text going to be?
> 
> I can say section 7.1
> 
> My action is ACTION-425
> 
> Ian Fette wrote:
> > I don't know, sometimes I feel used... :-)
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 2008-03-28 14:35:19 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> >>
> >>> "If a Web User Agent permits the used to administratively 
reconfigure
> >> nit: the use*r*
> >>
> >>> the primary user interface in such a way as to suppress any of the
> >>> displays required by this specification,  it MUST provide a simple
> >>> administrative mechanism, such as a single button in a configuration
> >>> menu, to reset the display to be in conformance with this
> >>> specification."
> >
> 

Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 18:31:00 UTC