ISSUE-190 relaxedpathvalidation Relaxed Path Validation - optional, recommended? from Mary Ellen Zurko on 2008-05-02 (public-wsc-wg@w3.org from May 2008)

From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 13:23:09 -0400
To: ifette@google.com
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD787BC6A.77C81D3E-ON8525743D.005F5871-8525743D.005F80AD@LocalDomain>

Ian, I'm thinking of putting ISSUE-190 on the agenda for next week. I find 
we make most effective use of meeting time on issues if there's a straw 
proposal, even if it's one the proposal doesn't fully believe in 
themselves, as it focuses the issue:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Apr/0045.html

Could you do that for this one?

Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 17:23:46 UTC