public-webapi@w3.org from April 2008 by date

Wednesday, 30 April 2008

• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll Jonas Sicking
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll Jonas Sicking
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll John Resig
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll John Resig
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll Jonas Sicking
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll John Resig
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll Jonas Sicking
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll Jonas Sicking
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll John Resig
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll John Resig
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll L. David Baron
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll Jonas Sicking
• [SelectorsAPI] Thoughts on querySelectorAll John Resig
• RE: Modal dialogs in HTML5 Mike Wilson
• Re: [DOM3Events] keyCode and charCode data requested Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 29 April 2008

• Re: Modal dialogs in HTML5 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Modal dialogs in HTML5 João Eiras
• Re: Modal dialogs in HTML5 Jonas Sicking
• RE: Modal dialogs in HTML5 Ian Hickson
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Ian Hickson
• Re: Modal dialogs in HTML5 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Modal dialogs in HTML5 João Eiras
• Re: Modal dialogs in HTML5 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Modal dialogs in HTML5 João Eiras
• RE: Modal dialogs in HTML5 Travis Leithead
• [DOM 3 Events] Telcon April 30, 2008 cancelled Andrew Emmons
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Chris Wilson
• RE: Modal dialogs in HTML5 Mike Wilson

Monday, 28 April 2008

• Re: [DOM3Events] keyCode and charCode data requested Darin Adler
• Initial telecon for the Rich Web Application Backplane XG Charles F Wiecha
• [DOM3Events] keyCode and charCode data requested Andrew Emmons
• Re: specification of "legacy" key events Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: [whatwg] Modal dialogs in HTML5 João Eiras

Sunday, 27 April 2008

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XMLHttpRequest Robert Hugo
• Modal dialogs in HTML5 Ian Hickson

Saturday, 26 April 2008

• specification of "legacy" key events Hallvord R. M. Steen

Thursday, 24 April 2008

• Re: ISSUE-123: Should DOM Level 3 Events support namespaced events? Stewart Brodie

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest() Constructor Cameron McCormack
• Re: [selectors-api] Proposal to Drop NSResolver from Selectors API v1 Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] Proposal to Drop NSResolver from Selectors API v1 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: [selectors-api] Proposal to Drop NSResolver from Selectors API v1 Travis Leithead
• [selectors-api] Proposal to Drop NSResolver from Selectors API v1 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: ISSUE-123: Should DOM Level 3 Events support namespaced events? Sergey Ilinsky
• ISSUE-123: Should DOM Level 3 Events support namespaced events? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Agenda, DOM3 Events telcon, 23 April 2008 Andrew Emmons
• [XHR] Improve the definitions of the send() and error flags Lachlan Hunt
• [XHR2] Editorial: OPENED State Lachlan Hunt
• [XHR] Overriding Request Headers with setRequestHeader() Lachlan Hunt
• [XHR] XMLHttpRequest() Constructor Lachlan Hunt
• Re: The XDR proposal from MS Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Ian Hickson
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Anne van Kesteren
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Sunava Dutta
• CFP: Mashups'08 @ ICSOC Nirmit Desai

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

• [XHR] Comments on the latest public working draft Sergiu Dumitriu
• CSS Query API vs Core lookupNamespaceURI Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XHR setting headers Julian Reschke

Monday, 21 April 2008

• RE: XHR setting headers Sunava Dutta

Sunday, 20 April 2008

• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Selector detection needed? Francois Remy

Friday, 18 April 2008

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Subbu Allamaraju
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Subbu Allamaraju
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] Leading and Trailing Whitespace in Selectors (was: Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR setting headers Peter Michaux
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Subbu Allamaraju
• Re: [selectors-api] Leading and Trailing Whitespace in Selectors Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Leading and Trailing Whitespace in Selectors (was: Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes) Lachlan Hunt
• RE: XHR LC Draft Feedback Sunava Dutta

Thursday, 17 April 2008

• Re: Mouse wheel feedback Doug Schepers
• RE: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Travis Leithead
• RE: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Travis Leithead
• Re: Mouse wheel feedback Ian Hickson
• Re: Mouse wheel feedback Doug Schepers
• Mouse wheel feedback Ian Hickson
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Subbu Allamaraju
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Subbu Allamaraju
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] LC-20080415 comment Stewart Brodie
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] LC-20080415 comment Subbu Allamaraju
• [XMLHttpRequest] Comment on the example in Section 1 Subbu Allamaraju
• Re: XHR setting headers Julian Reschke
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes João Eiras
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Last Call Kris Zyp
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Last Call Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 16 April 2008

• XHR setting headers Peter Michaux

Thursday, 17 April 2008

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Last Call Kris Zyp
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes L. David Baron
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes L. David Baron
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes L. David Baron
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 16 April 2008

• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Ian Hickson
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Ian Hickson
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes L. David Baron
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Jonas Sicking
• RE: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Travis Leithead
• RE: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Travis Leithead
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Arve Bersvendsen
• RE: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Travis Leithead
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Travis Leithead
• Minutes, DOM3 Events Telcon, 16 April 2008 Doug Schepers
• Re: [DOML3Events] Add success/failure boolean to add/removeEventListener? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: [DOML3Events] Add success/failure boolean to add/removeEventListener? Ian Hickson
• RE: [DOML3Events] Add success/failure boolean to add/removeEventListener? Travis Leithead
• DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 16 April 2008 (Today!!) Doug Schepers
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes João Eiras
• Re: [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Stewart Brodie
• [selectors-api] Handling :link and :visited Pseudo Classes Lachlan Hunt
• [XMLHttpRequest] LC-20080415 comment Stewart Brodie
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 15 April 2008

• XHR LC Draft Feedback Sunava Dutta
• [XMLHttpRequest] Small typose in W3C Working Draft 15 April 2008 Innovimax SARL
• Re: getElementsBySelectoron all NodeLists Lachlan Hunt
• getElementsBySelectoron all NodeLists Ian Hickson
• [XMLHttpRequest] Last Call Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Lachlan Hunt
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Kris Zyp
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Boris Zbarsky
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site =?ISO-8859-1?Q? Requests]?= Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Jonas Sicking

Monday, 14 April 2008

• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Jonas Sicking
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Doug Schepers
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Jonas Sicking
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Jonas Sicking
• Re: [DOM 3 Events] Keyboard events feedback Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Cross-domain access in Silverlight 2 Beta 1 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XDR *API* Security Impact Kris Zyp
• Re: XDR *API* Security Impact Thomas Roessler
• Re: XDR *API* Security Impact Kris Zyp
• Re: XDR *API* Security Impact Jon Ferraiolo
• XDR *API* Security Impact Thomas Roessler
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Jon Ferraiolo
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Kris Zyp
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Thomas Roessler
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Jon Ferraiolo
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Hallvord R. M. Steen

Sunday, 13 April 2008

• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Hallvord R. M. Steen

Saturday, 12 April 2008

• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Close, Tyler J.

Friday, 11 April 2008

• The XDR proposal from MS Charles McCathieNevile
• Some DOM Element interfaces for DOM Ranges David Bloom
• [Bindings] interfaces flattening Ian Hickson
• [bindings] Regarding the algorithm of 4.2.2. Interface prototype object liorean
• Re: [Bindings] [[Delete]], hidden operations, missing arguments Garrett Smith
• Re: [Bindings] [[Delete]], hidden operations, missing arguments liorean
• [Bindings] [[Delete]], hidden operations, missing arguments Ian Hickson

Thursday, 10 April 2008

• [Fwd: [closed] Re: Publication Request: Language Bindings for DOM WD] Doug Schepers
• Re: [DOM 3 Events] Keyboard events feedback Olli Pettay
• [DOM 3 Events] Keyboard events feedback Erik Dahlström
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] response headers for cross-site requests Laurens Holst
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jean-Yves Bitterlich
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Selector detection needed? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Selector detection needed? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] response headers for cross-site requests Ian Hickson
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Jonas Sicking
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Boris Zbarsky
• RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Travis Leithead

Wednesday, 9 April 2008

• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Jonas Sicking
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Travis Leithead
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Anne van Kesteren
• Minutes, DOM3 Events Telcon, 09 April 2008 Doug Schepers
• RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Travis Leithead
• Re: Some key event handling issues of interest Doug Schepers
• Re: Some key event handling issues of interest Doug Schepers
• [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator Travis Leithead
• DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 09 April 2008 (Today!!) Doug Schepers
• Re: Some key event handling issues of interest Olli Pettay

Tuesday, 8 April 2008

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] response headers for cross-site requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] response headers for cross-site requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] response headers for cross-site requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jean-Yves Bitterlich
• [XMLHttpRequest2] response headers for cross-site requests Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 7 April 2008

• Re: [SelectorsAPI] Selector detection needed? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Kris Zyp

Sunday, 6 April 2008

• Re: XHR tests Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 4 April 2008

• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Laurens Holst
• Moving the AC4CSR spec forward [Was: Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-a-vis W3C?] Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers

Thursday, 3 April 2008

• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Simon Pieters
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Some key event handling issues of interest Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Garrett Smith
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Ian Hickson
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Close, Tyler J.
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 2 April 2008

• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Close, Tyler J.
• Minutes, DOM3 Events Telcon, 02 April 2008 Doug Schepers
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: DOM3 Events Keyflow Olli Pettay
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR2] onprogress Event issue Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR2] onprogress Event issue Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR2] onprogress Event issue Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: Pipelining Control Proposal Kris Zyp
• DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 02 April 2008 (Tomorrow!!) Doug Schepers

Tuesday, 1 April 2008

• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• [Element Traversal LC] Thanks EOM Al Gilman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Henri Sivonen
• [XHR2] onprogress Event issue Julien Chaffraix

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 23:28:49 UTC