- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:59:53 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Julien Chaffraix" <julien.chaffraix@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:54:17 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > This is definitely a good question, one that I'd like to see addressed > too. > > I think that if the spec remains as is Firefox would likely fire events > that implements both the ProgressEvent interface and the LSProgressEvent > interface, but encourage people to use the ProgressEvent interface. > Possibly even by putting a message in the error console when the old > interface properties are accessed. If we want a different interface I think the progress events specification should be changed. XMLHttpRequest Level 2 simply uses whatever Progress Events 1.0 defines at this point and I'd like to keep it that way. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 11:00:55 UTC