Re: [XHR2] onprogress Event issue

On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:54:17 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> This is definitely a good question, one that I'd like to see addressed  
> too.
>
> I think that if the spec remains as is Firefox would likely fire events  
> that implements both the ProgressEvent interface and the LSProgressEvent  
> interface, but encourage people to use the ProgressEvent interface.  
> Possibly even by putting a message in the error console when the old  
> interface properties are accessed.

If we want a different interface I think the progress events specification  
should be changed. XMLHttpRequest Level 2 simply uses whatever Progress  
Events 1.0 defines at this point and I'd like to keep it that way.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 11:00:55 UTC