- From: Sergey Ilinsky <castonet@yahoo.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:53:06 +0100 (BST)
- To: Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <534483.25123.qm@web26905.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
A short input from implementors. In the Backbase Framework we do have implementation of the namespaced events (since we entirely implement DOM-Events Level 3 specification), however, to my knowledge, this featured subset is neither used by us nor by developers who use our framework. If you decide to drop the namespaced events, please adjust the CustomEvent interface and add a "initCustomEvent" method to it, since the interface is often used and having initCustomEventNS removed would make it useless. Sergey Ilinsky/ Principal Developer, Backbase Web APIs Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> wrote: ISSUE-123: Should DOM Level 3 Events support namespaced events? http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/123 Raised by: Anne van Kesteren On product: DOM 3 Events There are several reasons for dropping namespaced events as we discussed during today's telcon: * Browser vendors have not implemented them * There has been very little to no demand from Web developers for these features. * Implementing this feature increases QA cost * Implementing this feature increases the complexity of the Web platform The main argument in favor seems to be libraries being able to distinguish event types from each other. Given that they currently use a simple string for this purpose (dojo.xxx, etc.) and that seems to work fine having namespaces does not seem necessary here. There's also not infinite libraries and you won't use infinite libraries on a Web page so the advantage seems really slim. --------------------------------- Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email.
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 20:53:46 UTC