public-script-coord@w3.org from October to December 2009 by author

Alex Russell

• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)

Allen Wirfs-Brock

• RE: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)
• RE: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)
• Web IDL/ECMA Script Impedence Mismatch: Overloading (Saturday, 3 October)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Interactions between optional and nullable (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Interactions between optional and nullable (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Web IDL/ECMA Script Impedence Mismatch: Overloading (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: Additional notes from last Thursday's meeting (Monday, 5 October)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: Hiatus (Sunday, 11 October)
• Web IDL and the New Scripting Coordination List (Thursday, 1 October)

Ash Berlin

• Re: Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Saturday, 7 November)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Thursday, 8 October)

Brendan Eich

• Re: Interactions between optional and nullable (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Property enumeration on forms (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (was: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks) (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (was: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (was: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)

Breton Slivka

• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)

Cameron McCormack

• Fw: Web IDL spec nitpick: SHOULD and SHOULD NOT? (Friday, 16 October)
• Hiatus (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Web IDL for DOM specifications (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Naming for custom/specialized extended attributes? (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Thursday, 8 October)
• Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [Constructor] vs [NamedConstructor] (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Monday, 5 October)
• Additional notes from last Thursday's meeting (Monday, 5 October)

Charles Jolley

• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)

David Flanagan

• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)

David-Sarah Hopwood

• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Tuesday, 13 October)

Dean Landolt

• Re: Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Friday, 6 November)

Dimitry Golubovsky

• Re: Naming for custom/specialized extended attributes? (Thursday, 8 October)
• Naming for custom/specialized extended attributes? (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [Constructor] vs [NamedConstructor] (Monday, 5 October)
• [Constructor] vs [NamedConstructor] (Friday, 2 October)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• New version of WebIDL checker (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Generating test cases from WebIDL (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Generating test cases from WebIDL (Tuesday, 13 October)

Doug Schepers

• Re: Web IDL and the New Scripting Coordination List (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints? (Thursday, 1 October)

Garrett Smith

• Re: Hypothetical WebIDL block for EventTarget (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: Hypothetical WebIDL block for EventTarget (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Friday, 2 October)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Monday, 16 November)

Ian Hickson

• Re: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] enum (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments (Tuesday, 24 November)

James Graham

• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Monday, 16 November)

Jason Orendorff

• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)

Jim Blandy

• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [WebIDL] enum (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: What is the use-case for binary data in client-side script? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Property enumeration on forms (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: Property enumeration on forms (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Additional notes from last Thursday's meeting (Monday, 5 October)

Jorge Chamorro

• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Thursday, 3 December)

Kris Kowal

• Binary API Design Questions (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Saturday, 14 November)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: What is the use-case for binary data in client-side script? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Possible Agenda items for Joint TC39/WebApps WG meeting (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Binary Data - possible topic for joint session (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Property enumeration on forms (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (was: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (was: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Naming for custom/specialized extended attributes? (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)

Marcin Hanclik

• RE: Java bindings generated from Web IDL (Wednesday, 9 December)
• RE: Interactions between optional and nullable (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: [WebIDL] enum (Tuesday, 24 November)
• RE: [WebIDL] enum (Tuesday, 17 November)
• [WebIDL] enum (Monday, 16 November)

Mark Miller

• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Sunday, 15 November)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Sunday, 22 November)
• Conflicts between W3C specs and ES5? (Sunday, 15 November)
• Strategies for standardizing mistakes (was: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks) (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Monday, 5 October)

Mike Shaver

• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Strategies for standardizing mistakes (Thursday, 15 October)

Oliver Hunt

• Re: Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Friday, 6 November)

Patrick Mueller

• Re: Static Array and String Generics and Host Objects (ATTN IE Team) (Wednesday, 9 December)

Preston L. Bannister

• Re: What is the use-case for binary data in client-side script? (Thursday, 12 November)
• What is the use-case for binary data in client-side script? (Wednesday, 11 November)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Interactions between optional and nullable (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Interactions between optional and nullable (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Interactions between optional and nullable (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Date/time types in Web IDL (Wednesday, 7 October)

Shiki Okasaka

• Re: Java bindings generated from Web IDL (Thursday, 10 December)
• Java bindings generated from Web IDL (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Web IDL for DOM specifications (Thursday, 3 December)
• Project list using Web IDL for directly implementing software components (Tuesday, 20 October)

Simon Pieters

• Typo in WebIDL? (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Notes from Monday's meeting with TC39 folks (Friday, 9 October)

Steffen Krüssel

• Re: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments (Friday, 27 November)
• [WebIDL] Static Attributes and Operations (Friday, 13 November)
• Fwd: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments (Friday, 13 November)

Tim Renouf

• Web IDL and arrays (Friday, 30 October)

Travis Leithead

• Possible Agenda items for Joint TC39/WebApps WG meeting (Friday, 6 November)
• Notes from our WebIDL + ES5 phone chat today... (Thursday, 1 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 10 December 2009 01:28:14 UTC