Re: Web IDL for DOM specifications

• From: Shiki Okasaka <shiki@google.com>
• Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:16:36 +0900
• To: public-script-coord@w3.org
• Message-ID: <2fdcc83a0912022316v4793cdcdmce1f4cfcb981256c@mail.gmail.com>

FYI, a list of trivial errata in the IDL files I found:

* dom2events.idl
  missing,
    typedef dom::Document Document;

* dom2traversal.idl
  missing,
    typedef dom::Document Document;

* dom3ls.idl
  missing,
    typedef dom::DOMImplementation DOMImplementation;

  typos. 'Object' -> 'object',
    typedef   Object LSInputStream;
    typedef   Object LSOutputStream;
    typedef   Object LSReader;
    typedef   Object LSWriter;


 - Shiki

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> FYI, a couple of months ago I rewrote the IDL from various DOM specs to
> use Web IDL, including using ‘implements’, index getters, [Callback],
> [PrototypeRoot], getraises/setraises, and the ‘?’ syntax for nullable
> strings:
>
>  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/dom/
>
> --
> Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
>
>

Received on Thursday, 3 December 2009 07:17:15 UTC