- From: David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sarah@jacaranda.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:00:40 +0100
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > I think the disconnect you're seeing is this: some weigh the costs of > optional behavior as greater than the hypothetical benefit of someday > removing a "bad" feature. Bad features don't really harm anything but > our sense of taste. Bad features hurt security. (I find it somewhat incredible that the effect of bad features on sceurity, and that effect as a motivation for actively removing them, has hardly been mentioned in this thread.) -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ http://davidsarah.livejournal.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 07:22:49 UTC