Monday, 30 September 2013
Sunday, 29 September 2013
Friday, 27 September 2013
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
Thursday, 26 September 2013
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: rdf semantics test suite setup
- Re: rdf semantics test suite setup
- (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph
- Re: rdf semantics test suite setup
- rdf semantics test suite setup
Wednesday, 25 September 2013
- Re: defn of Named Graph
- minutes for 25 September
- RDF-ISSUE-143: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs? [RDF Semantics]
Tuesday, 24 September 2013
Saturday, 21 September 2013
Thursday, 19 September 2013
Wednesday, 18 September 2013
- Re: agenda today's telecon 18 Sep
- Re: TriG - review comments
- Re: TriG - review comments
- Re: editorial review of TriG
- Re: TriG - review comments
- TriG - review comments
- Re: editorial review of TriG
- Re: question about Trig spec
- Re: question about Trig spec
- agenda today's telecon 18 Sep
- Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
Tuesday, 17 September 2013
- Re: RDF Dataset semantics
- Re: RDF Dataset semantics
- Re: RDF Dataset semantics
- RDF Dataset semantics
- test suite URLs
- Re: editorial review of TriG
- Re: editorial review of TriG
Monday, 16 September 2013
- Re: editorial review of TriG
- Re: question about Trig spec
- Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- an apology, was: Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- Re: question about Trig spec
- Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- Re: question about Trig spec
- Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- question about Trig spec
- editorial review of TriG
Sunday, 15 September 2013
- Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)
- Re: Possible tweak to datatype semantics
Friday, 13 September 2013
- Re: Possible tweak to datatype semantics
- Re: Possible tweak to datatype semantics
- Re: Possible tweak to datatype semantics
- Re: Possible tweak to datatype semantics
- Re: Possible tweak to datatype semantics
- Re: Possible tweak to datatype semantics
- Possible tweak to datatype semantics
- Re: test suite changes (ACTION-291)
Thursday, 12 September 2013
- Re: test suite changes (ACTION-291)
- Re: test suite changes (ACTION-291)
- Re: test suite changes (ACTION-291)
- Issue on fragment ID-s closed (Issue-141)
- Re: Regarding 6. Fragment Identifiers in http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-fragID (tracker, this is on ISSUE-141)
Wednesday, 11 September 2013
Thursday, 12 September 2013
- Re: test suite changes (ACTION-291)
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: tracking last call comments for Concepts and Semantics
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- rogue posts on public-rdf-comments
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- test suite changes (ACTION-291)
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38
Wednesday, 11 September 2013
- Re: tracking last call comments for Concepts and Semantics
- tracking last call comments for Concepts and Semantics
- Re: proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics]
- proposed second reply to Jeremy's comment about named graphs
- Re: agenda 11 Sep telecon
- proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38
- Re: ReSpec Help?
- Re: Regarding 6. Fragment Identifiers in http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-fragID (tracker, this is on ISSUE-141)
- Re: agenda 11 Sep telecon / Remaining Work To Do
- Re: agenda 11 Sep telecon
- Re: ReSpec Help?
- ReSpec Help?
- Re: Remaining Work To Do
- Re: Remaining Work To Do
- [Concepts] Insertion of ISSUE-139 Resolution
Tuesday, 10 September 2013
- Re: agenda 11 Sep telecon
- Aw: agenda 11 Sep telecon
- Remaining Work To Do
- JSON-LD and JSON-LD API Published as CR
- Re: agenda 11 Sep telecon
- agenda 11 Sep telecon
Saturday, 7 September 2013
- Re: TriG : call for technical review
- Re: TriG : call for technical review
- Fwd: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35
- Re: TriG : call for technical review
- Call for Exclusions: N-Triples, N-Quads
- Re: TriG : call for technical review
Friday, 6 September 2013
- Re: Question re ISSUE-139 Resolution
- Re: Review response from the MLW-LT WG (Re: Request for review from the RDF working group: ITS 2.0)
- Rejoining WG
- Review response from the MLW-LT WG (Re: Request for review from the RDF working group: ITS 2.0)
Thursday, 5 September 2013
Wednesday, 4 September 2013
- Question re ISSUE-139 Resolution
- Re: Resolved: N-Quads to LCWD
- Re: N-Triples Test Suite Link Required
- N-Triples Test Suite Link Required
- Resolved: N-Quads to LCWD
- Re: two RDF-WG LCWD's
- Re: two RDF-WG LCWD's
- Re: two RDF-WG LCWD's
- RDF Minutes for 4 September
- Re: two RDF-WG LCWD's
- Re: two RDF-WG LCWD's
- two RDF-WG LCWD's
- n-quads and n-triples test suite URLs
- n-quads "datasets"
- Re: Agenda for 4 September 2013
- Re: Agenda for 4 September 2013
- Re: Agenda for 4 September 2013
Tuesday, 3 September 2013
- Re: Publishing RDF/JSON as
- Re: Publishing RDF/JSON as
- TriG : call for technical review
- Re: Change to ACTIONs 285 and 286?
- Re: Fw: Re: Request for review from the RDF working group: ITS 2.0