- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:56:46 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Overall, a discussion note would be good. On 26/09/13 20:02, Sandro Hawke wrote: > We have two levels of specs, right? There are the ones that are > thoroughly reviewed and proven to be implentable, which we call > Recommendations. The terminology "named graph" is in use in RECs and RECs-to-be. Redefining terminology might be appealing in the short term but I feel only leads to confusion long term. rdf-11-concepts: """ Each named graph is a pair consisting of an IRI or a blank node (the graph name), and an RDF graph. """ and in JSON-LD (sec 7, Data Model) and in SPARQL (sec 12.1.2) Andy
Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 07:57:15 UTC