- From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:51:37 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-143: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs? [RDF Semantics]
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/143
Raised by: Guus Schreiber
On product: RDF Semantics
Comment from Paul Groth:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Sep/0030.html
Hi All,
I was reviewing the Trig spec. We use trig to express nanopublications -
light weight forms of provenance attached to graphs. Each nanopublication
has three graphs associated with it:
- an assertion graph
- a publication info graph
- a provenance graph
The provenance graph points to the the assertion graph.
GRAPH :assert { ... }
GRAPH :provenance { :assert prov:wasDerivedFrom :xyz . }
Is this ok with what's coming out?
I ask because we have a ton of post translational modifications and protein
isoforms modeled like this [1]/
Thanks!
Paul
[1] http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/system/files/swj461.pdf
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 15:51:39 UTC