W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2013

Re: rdf semantics test suite setup

From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:33:48 +0200
Message-ID: <524429AC.4090806@emse.fr>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
I am working on this.

It's easy to identify the tests that are about semantics thanks to the 
manifest where entailment tests are clearly identified. But a file that 
is used for a parser test can be used for an entailment test too.

Besides, the vocabularies used by the 2004 manifest are different from 
the one used in the Turtle / NTriples / NQuads / TriG tests.
I'm not sure what should be used for the entailment tests.

Also, should we not have a document to describe all the test cases 
(Syntaxes and semantics) and describe the manifest vocabularies (like 
the 2004 RDF Test Cases)?


Le 26/09/2013 13:59, Gregg Kellogg a écrit :
> Sent from my iPad
>> On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:09 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>> The 2004 test suite is described and enumerated here: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#testcases
>> I've copied the tests themselves (the contents of the last test zipfile generated) to mercurial, at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/default/rdf-mt/tests/2004-test-suite
> I note that many of these tests are not of semantics, but of RDF/XML syntax or processing. It would be useful to identify which test directories are of interest for rdf-mt. I could take a stab at this, but wouldn't want to leave something that might be important.
> There are also some triples that describe datatypes being tested, are these actually used for running the 1.0 tests, or are they primarily informational?
> Gregg
>> I hope that's what you wanted.       (cf ACTION-298)
>>         -- Sandro

Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 12:34:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:32 UTC