Re: proposal: "box datasets" (sandro's dataset spec, v0.1)

" Even though "1.0"^^xs:double "1.00"^^xs:double denote the same thing,
they are not the same RDF term, so the triple { :a :b 1.0 } is not the same
triple as { :a :b 1.00 }.  Since they are not the same triple, the datasets
which say they are each what is contained by :g1 cannot both be true.
(See "Literal Term Equality" in RDF 1.1 Concepts.)"

Do you have a corresponding notion of exact graph matching that works with
bnodes too? Is it needed?

Does this intuitive 'contains' mean 'contains right now', 'contains last
time I looked', or something else?

Dan