ODRL Meeting - June 2024
[JOB] Postdoc position in LLMs and Policy specifications at Dublin City University
[CfP] 1st NeXt-Generation Data Governance workshop @ SEMANTiCS 2024 – NXDG 2024
How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
- Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
clarification needed in a case of 'constraint of a rule' vs 'refinement of an action' ?
- Re: clarification needed in a case of 'constraint of a rule' vs 'refinement of an action' ?
- Re: clarification needed in a case of 'constraint of a rule' vs 'refinement of an action' ?
The challenges of HTML editing
ODRL Semantics
Next "ODRL Semantics" Teleconference on Friday 10th May 2024 at 9:00 a.m. CET
ODRL Teleconference (May 2024)
use of the term 'violated' in the context of a Obligation. [formal-semantics]
'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]
- Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics]