public-odrl@w3.org from May 2024 by author

Harshvardhan J. Pandit

• [JOB] Postdoc position in LLMs and Policy specifications at Dublin City University (Tuesday, 28 May)

Joshua Cornejo

• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: Next "ODRL Semantics" Teleconference on Friday 10th May 2024 at 9:00 a.m. CET (Thursday, 16 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: clarification needed in a case of 'constraint of a rule' vs 'refinement of an action' ? (Monday, 13 May)
• The challenges of HTML editing (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: ODRL Semantics (Friday, 10 May)
• ODRL Semantics (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: ODRL Teleconference (May 2024) (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: use of the term 'violated' in the context of a Obligation. [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Unlocking the Path for Product and Policy Users: Practical Integration of DCAT and ODRL (Wednesday, 1 May)

Nicoletta Fornara

• Re: Next "ODRL Semantics" Teleconference on Friday 10th May 2024 at 9:00 a.m. CET (Friday, 10 May)
• Next "ODRL Semantics" Teleconference on Friday 10th May 2024 at 9:00 a.m. CET (Tuesday, 7 May)

Renato Iannella

• ODRL Meeting - June 2024 (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: clarification needed in a case of 'constraint of a rule' vs 'refinement of an action' ? (Tuesday, 14 May)

Sarven Capadisli

• Re: The challenges of HTML editing (Tuesday, 21 May)

Sridhar Krishnamurthy

• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Wednesday, 15 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Wednesday, 15 May)
• How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: clarification needed in a case of 'constraint of a rule' vs 'refinement of an action' ? (Tuesday, 14 May)
• clarification needed in a case of 'constraint of a rule' vs 'refinement of an action' ? (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Saturday, 4 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Saturday, 4 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: use of the term 'violated' in the context of a Obligation. [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• use of the term 'violated' in the context of a Obligation. [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Explain E20-3 evaluation please (Wednesday, 1 May)
• Re: Explain E20-3 evaluation please (Wednesday, 1 May)

Steyskal, Simon

• RE: ODRL Semantics (Friday, 10 May)

UGent-imec

• [CfP] 1st NeXt-Generation Data Governance workshop @ SEMANTiCS 2024 – NXDG 2024 (Thursday, 16 May)

Víctor Rodríguez Doncel

• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Friday, 17 May)
• Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ? (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: ODRL Teleconference (May 2024) (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: 'not-set' and 'not violated' in the context of prohibition [formal-semantics] (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: ODRL Teleconference (May 2024) (Friday, 3 May)
• ODRL Teleconference (May 2024) (Friday, 3 May)

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2024 05:59:44 UTC