Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?

Hi Sridhar…since we defined the property with a MUST on the datatype, then we cannot support other datatypes (even though the language supports this).

I don’t think there are any other profiles that meet your needs, so you may need to create one..

Cheers - R


> On 21 May 2024, at 18:35, Sridhar Krishnamurthy <ksridhar@amagi.com> wrote:
> 
> Respected Sir,
> 
> A very valid observation and question.
> 
> I suppose that the leftOperand 'dateTime' as presented in the example 
> is a placeholder for discussions in this thread.
> 
> Surely we may not be able to use 'dateTime' and 'timeInterval' for the text/calendar
> expression because of the type imposed on them by the specification.
> 
> This is the reason why i wanted (in the beginning of the thread) to know whether 
> 
> (a) there exists profiles as in https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/wiki/ODRL_Profiles 
> which contain a leftOperand which might model something close to 'recurrentInterval' or
> 'recurrentTime' ? 
>       (OR)
> (b) a possibility to introduce a leftOperand similar to recurrentInterval' or
> 'recurrentTime'in the common vocabulary 
> (https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#constraintLeftOperandCommon)
> 
> regards
> 
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 1:09 PM Joshua Cornejo <josh@marketdata.md <mailto:josh@marketdata.md>> wrote:
>> The definition for the Datetime LeftOperand is:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#term-dateTime
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The date (and optional time and timezone) of exercising the action of the Rule. Right operand value MUST be an xsd:date or xsd:dateTime as defined by [xmlschema11-2 <https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#bib-xmlschema11-2>].
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Considering the use of Camel - is this referring to a different LeftOperand?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> ___________________________________
>> 
>> Joshua Cornejo
>> 
>> marketdata <https://www.marketdata.md/>
>> embed open standards
>> 
>> across your supply chain
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la <mailto:r@iannel.la>>
>> Date: Monday 20 May 2024 at 06:56
>> To: "public-odrl@w3.org <mailto:public-odrl@w3.org> Group" <public-odrl@w3.org <mailto:public-odrl@w3.org>>
>> Subject: Re: How can recurrent temporal constraints be expressed ?
>> Resent-From: <public-odrl@w3.org <mailto:public-odrl@w3.org>>
>> Resent-Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 05:55:53 +0000
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 17 May 2024, at 17:08, Sridhar Krishnamurthy <ksridhar@amagi.com <mailto:ksridhar@amagi.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>    "constraint": [{
>>            "leftOperand": "dateTime",
>>            "operator": "gte",
>>            "rightOperand":  { "@value": "RRULE:FREQ=MONTHLY;INTERVAL=1;COUNT=1;UNTIL=2024-12-31",  }
>>        },{
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The above would definitely need to add the datatype:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>    "rightOperand":  { "@value": "RRULE:FREQ=MONTHLY;INTERVAL=1;COUNT=1;UNTIL=2024-12-31”,  “@type”: "https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/calendar” }
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> R
>> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER: The contents of this email, including any attachments that it may contain, are privileged and confidential information, and may also constitute as proprietary, and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by email and delete the original message. Unintended recipients are strictly prohibited from copying, disclosing, and/or distributing such contents in any manner or form. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this transmission that do not relate to the official business of Amagi, including all its affiliates, shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Any statements made herein that are tantamount to contractual obligations, promises, claims or commitments shall not be binding on the Company unless expressly and specifically stated as otherwise, or followed by written confirmation, by an authorized signatory of the Company.