Andrea Perego
Annette Greiner
Antoine Isaac
- Re: issue-202: asserting the dataset's metadata conforms to certain standards (Friday, 27 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 27 November)
- Re: issue-202: asserting the dataset's metadata conforms to certain standards (Friday, 27 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 20 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 20 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-210: Code lists are used for describing metadata or data values? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 20 November)
- Re: ISSUE-202: Relation between dqv, iso 19115/19157 and geodcat-ap (Thursday, 12 November)
- Re: ISSUE-202: Relation between dqv, iso 19115/19157 and geodcat-ap (Thursday, 12 November)
- Re: Changing BPs in data vocabulary section (Thursday, 12 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-209: A definition for standardized term should be included in the glossary [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 12 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 12 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-212: Should we use the term shared vocabulary instead of vocabulary? Should we use "Reuse Vocabularies" or "Use vocabularies" for the title of the BP? [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 12 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-210: Code lists are used for describing metadata or data values? [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 12 November)
- Re: Changing BPs in data vocabulary section (Monday, 9 November)
- Changing BPs in data vocabulary section (Sunday, 8 November)
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 26 November)
- Re: Agenda for this week's call (Friday, 20 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-206: The example with memento needs to be rewritten to use the transport example [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 17 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 17 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-210: Code lists are used for describing metadata or data values? [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 17 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-213 (BP_REST): Changes on BP about REST APIs [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 16 November)
- Re: Help with vocabularies to describe transport information (Friday, 13 November)
- Re: Changing BPs in data vocabulary section (Tuesday, 10 November)
- Re: Help with vocabularies to describe transport information (Monday, 9 November)
- Re: Help with vocabularies to describe transport information (Monday, 9 November)
- Re: Changing BPs in data vocabulary section (Sunday, 8 November)
- Help with vocabularies to describe transport information (Friday, 6 November)
- Re: Best Practices Cross-Reference Section (Friday, 6 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-206: The example with memento needs to be rewritten to use the transport example [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 6 November)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (Friday, 6 November)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-206: The example with memento needs to be rewritten to use the transport example [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 4 November)
Caroline Burle
Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
- dwbp-ISSUE-219: Tying DUV to Use Case requirements. [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Friday, 20 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-218: Level of detail sharing 3rd party vocabularies that can be used with DUV [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Friday, 20 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-217: Review data usage model [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Friday, 20 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-216: duv:Rating as an instance of daq:Metric [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Friday, 20 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-215: duv:Publication versus foaf:Document [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Friday, 20 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Friday, 20 November)
- dwbp-ACTION-219: Send an email to discuss the suggestion to add the assertion that a dataset's metadata conforms to a standard (like geojson) (Friday, 13 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-213 (BP_REST): Changes on BP about REST APIs [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 13 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-212: Should we use the term shared vocabulary instead of vocabulary? Should we use "Reuse Vocabularies" or "Use vocabularies" for the title of the BP? [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 10 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-211: Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 10 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-210: Code lists are used for describing metadata or data values? [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 10 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-209: A definition for standardized term should be included in the glossary [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 10 November)
- dwbp-ACTION-218: Add the example for the data identifiers section (Friday, 6 November)
- dwbp-ACTION-217: Write to christophe and ask for help with writing the examples for data preservation (Friday, 6 November)
- ISSUE-208: What to say about subsetting data, and identifying those subsets. this to be done in conjunction with sdw wg about this issue (Friday, 6 November)
- dwbp-ACTION-216: Add note to the bp doc that we are discussing the issue of subsetting data, and identifying those subsets. and that we're talking to the sdw wg about this issue too (Friday, 6 November)
- dwbp-ISSUE-207: Move BP Maintain separate versions for a data API to the Data Versioning section [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 6 November)
Debattista, Jeremy
Deirdre Lee
Eric Stephan
Ghislain Atemezing
Hadley Beeman
Herbert Van de Sompel
Ig Ibert Bittencourt
João Paulo Almeida
Laufer
Makx Dekkers
Mark Harrison
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
Newton
Nitai B. Silva
Phil Archer
Pieter Colpaert
Riccardo Albertoni
- Re: issue-202: asserting the dataset's metadata conforms to certain standards (Monday, 30 November)
- Fwd: Problems removing hasDimension and hasMetric as abstract properties (Friday, 27 November)
- Fwd: Problems removing hasDimension and hasMetric as abstract properties (Friday, 27 November)
- Fwd: Problems removing hasDimension and hasMetric as abstract properties (Friday, 27 November)
- Fwd: Problems removing hasDimension and hasMetric as abstract properties (Friday, 27 November)
- Re: Agenda for this week's call (Thursday, 19 November)
- issue-202: asserting the dataset's metadata conforms to certain standards (Friday, 13 November)
- Re: ISSUE-202: Relation between dqv, iso 19115/19157 and geodcat-ap (Thursday, 12 November)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (Friday, 6 November)
Yasodara
Last message date: Monday, 30 November 2015 16:50:45 UTC